pISSN: 2723 - 6609 e-ISSN: 2745-5254
Vol. 4, No. 10 October 2023 http://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/
Doi: 10.59141/jist.v4i10.692 1681
IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTRIC MOTOR INSPECTION PROCESS IN SERVICE
REPAIR WORKSHOP: WITH LEAN CONSUMPTION MAP APPROACH
Irani Harefa
1*
, Edi Hamdi
2
, Tantri Yanuar
3
, Rina Annindita
4
Esa Unggul University Jakarta, Indonesia
*Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Keywords: lean services; lean
consumption map; workshop
service repair.
The inspection process at the workshop service repair in this study is a
crucial step in terms of providing speedy service to customers. The
amount of waste and non-value-added activities in the inspection
process is the main problem that must be corrected to increase
competitive advantage. This study aims to determine the application of
Lean Services in the inspection repair process at workshops service
repair using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and
Control) method and the LCM (Lean Consumption Map) tool. This
study uses qualitative research methods based on direct observation of
work processes and areas, interviews with several competent
informants (internal and external), and analysis of forms and procedures
documents. From the results of the search, it was found that research on
the application of Lean Services is still limited to a few public service
sectors, while similar research in the workshops service repair business
is still rare and/or in its early stages. The results of this study found that
the Lean Services concept with the DMAIC method and LCM tools can
be applied and can improve the inspection process in workshop service
repair. Then indirectly provides added value, increases trust, and
increases customer satisfaction, which can be applied to other similar
service workshop businesses. One of the biggest challenges in
implementing Lean Services in the workshop service repair business is
the non-systematic characteristics of the workshop business, the
different types of work, and the varying characteristics of customer
satisfaction. This research tries to contribute to and expand the evidence
on the application of Lean Services to improve business repair services
and encourage research on other similar businesses in the future.
Introduction
Today's industrial era 4.0 is increasingly putting strong pressure on the industrial
world in terms of operational reliability. Electric motors are one of the most widely used
industrial machines, where it is estimated that about 70% of the total electricity load in
an industry is used by electric motors (Ahlstrom, 2004). Electric motors are equipment
that converts electrical energy into mechanical energy as a drive for equipment or
machinery, for example, pumping machines, compressors, belt conveyors, and so on. The
vital role of electric motors in this industry on the other hand causes the need for fast and
quality maintenance and repair. However, due to limited resources, the industry certainly
needs third-party support from electric motor maintenance and repair service providers.
UKB Millenium service repair workshop located in the Tigaraksa area, Tangerang
is one of the providers of electric motor maintenance and repair services to various small
and large-scale invoice industries in Indonesia. This workshop has problems related to
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1682
the inspection process of electric motor repairs that are high compared to the KPI (Key
Performance Indicator) target. Figure 1 below shows the flow diagram of the inspection
process in the workshop which has not been effective and there are many wastes, such as
waste of movement, place, waiting, and so on.
Figure 1. Flow chart on the inspection process
Figure 2. LCM before Lean Consumption
Figure 2 above shows the LCM condition before Lean Consumption, then in Table
1 below shows that for the inspection process, the customer as a service user takes a total
of 2,735 minutes, with a total value added of 285 minutes (10.4%) and a total of non-
value added of 2,450 minutes (89.6%). While the workshop as a service provider takes a
total of 3,045 minutes, with a total value added of 850 minutes (27.9%) and a total of
non-value added of 2,195 minutes (72.1%).
Table 1
Data LCM Before (Value Added Assessment)
Information
Customer
(Consumption Time)
Provider
(Provision Time)
60 menit 2% 540 menit 20% 480 menit 18% 1655 menit 61% 2735 menit (Total Consumer Time)
10 60 180 5
50 480 300 180
20
89.6%
480
10
960
10.4%
195 menit 7% 790 menit 29% 940 menit 34% 1120 menit 41% 3045 menit (Total Provider Time)
60 15 60 60
120 60 60 180
72.1%
5 5 120 5
10 25 30 10
10 120 10
20 340 240
27.9%
120 120 30
30 30 5
5 20 5
15 40 10
5 5
480 50
60
420
5
10
5
10
SPV review draft
report
Reporting engineer
revisi draft report
Reporting engineer
kirim report ke SPV
Komunikasi ke sales
untuk service mesin
Sales koordinasi ke
tim workshop (ws)
Terima report-harga
dan review
Nego harga dan
waktu service
Kirimkan PO service
Reporting engineer
buat draft report
Reporting engineer
kirim draft ke SPV
Lakukan cleaning dan
heating
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (3)
CONSUMER
(Industrial company)
PROVIDER
(Workshop ABB team)
GL buat report per
inspeksi
Terima mesin di
workshop
SPV info customer
untuk witnesst
11
12
1
1
2
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (1)
3
SPV kirim report-
harga ke sales
Sales kirim report-
harga ke customer
Group leader cek
slot waktu inspeksi
13
SPV review &
approve draft report
SPV carikan harga
material ke subcon
Standby menunggu
witnest customer
10
Mekanik lakukan
dismantling
Datang witnesst
proses di ws
Sales konfirmasi ke
customer
Kirim mesin ke
workshop
9
Mekanik lakukan
pengukuran mekanik
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (2)
Before lean
service
Non-Value
Added Time
Value Added
Time
Before lean
service
Non-Value
Added Time
Value Added
Time
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1683
Total Time
(a)
2735
3045
Value Added
(b)
285
850
Non value Added
(c)
2450
2195
% VA
= (b) / (a) * 100%
10.4%
27.9%
% NVA
= (c) / (a) * 100%
89.6%
72.1%
Value to Waste Ratio
= (b) / (c) * 100%
12%
39%
This delay in the inspection process provides major losses for the workshop as a
provider, including reducing customer competitiveness and trust, while for customers it
will reduce trust and disrupt the production or operational process. Because of the
criticality of this problem, improvements need to be made to identify and reduce waste
and non-value-added activities.
Based on The study of Womack and Jones (2005) on the same process as in this
study states that Lean Services with Lean Consumption tools can provide satisfaction to
customers by solving customer problems well, effective process time, and not making it
difficult for customers not to spend time with customers.
The application of Lean Six Sigma in the service sector can increase profits and
customer satisfaction (Vignesh, Suresh, &; Aramvalarthan, 2016), improve services to
the community (Antony et al. 2017), and improve company performance by reducing all
forms of non-value-added activities (Ferdousi & Ahmed, 2009). Several previous studies
have found that Lean Six Sigma has proven to be successfully applied in the service sector
(Appendix Table 5), including hospital services (Bhat, Gijo, & Jnanesh, 2014)(Bhat et
al., 2014; Susanti et al., 2020), government public administration (Fletcher, 2018;
Sunaryanto & Shah, 2018; Shah et al., 2019), logistics (Lee, Olson, Lee, Hwang, &;
Shin, 2008), office (Silva, 2015), education (LeMahieu, Nordstrum, & Greco, 2017),
banking (Sunder, Ganesh, &; Marathe, 2019), financial sector services organizations
(LeMahieu, Nordstrum, & Greco, 2017)and information technology services (Sunder,
Ganesh, & Marathe, 2019)(Delgado, Ferreira, & Branco, 2010)(Gijo, Antony, & Sunder
M, 2018).
However, the application of Lean service as in the studies above is still limited to
a few service sectors so it requires further research in other service business sectors that
are more detailed, where Lean Service has been (or can) be applied (Leite &; Vieira,
2015)(Leite & Vieira, 2015). Such continued research should focus more on providing
empirical evidence on the impact of Lean systems on performance in the context of
services (Hadid & Mansouri, 2014). Moreover, research by (Arlinghaus & Knizkov,
2020) concluded that the status quo of Lean implementation in the repair workshop
business is still at an early stage and is still not developed.
Researchers have also never found a thesis or similar research that reviews the
application of Lean Six Sigma in the service repair workshop business using the Lean
Consumption Map (LCM) tool. In fact, according to Womack and Jones (Womack &
Jones, 2005), this LCM tool is very suitable for describing current state and future state
conditions for services in the service company sector, especially the service repair
workshop business model like this study.
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1684
Based on these considerations, researchers want to research the application of Lean
Services in a service repair workshop company using LCM and DMAIC tools. The choice
of LCM tools is because other tools tend to be commonly applied in manufacturing
companies and some companies in the suit (service) sector. This study aims to determine
the application of Lean Service in the inspection process, reduce non-value-added
activities, add research in the same field, and increase the knowledge of researchers and
academics. In the future, it is hoped that this research can be a reference for other
researchers.
Lean Consumption Map (LCM)
According to Womack and Jones ((Womack & Jones, 2005), the concept of the
Lean Consumption Map (LCM) is a tool that is very suitable for service industries, such
as workshops. LCM is one of the tools for organizations to see more deeply the needs of
their customers to provide value to customers (Gülyaz, van der Veen, Venugopal, &
Solaimani, 2019). (Leite & Vieira, 2015) concluded that Lean Service does not have a
single tool model or practice and standard only.
Metode Penelitian
Researchers use qualitative research methods, where data is obtained based on
process observations, interviews, photo documentation of processes and work areas in the
workshop, document analysis, procedures, and inspection reports. Researchers conducted
this research at the UKB Millennium workshop in the Tigaraksa area, Tangerang
Regency, for approximately three months starting from April to June 2021.
Results and Discussion
As a first step, researchers use the Time Series Plot tool to determine the target
measure of success if the data trend used is random or random. The results in Figure 3
below show that the inspection process of the electric motor has a random trend.
Figure 3. Time Plot Series Before Lean Consumption
Thus the data can be used to determine the target measure of success of
improvement efforts also called improvement projects as shown in Figure 4 below.
Determining the goal statement of success measures is very necessary for every Lean
Service project because it is closely related to guiding all parties involved in the process
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1685
and other teams in the process, where in the future there will be the opportunity to
continue other improvement proposals after the project is handed over to the process
owner. There is also ease of communication to all teams involved in providing an
overview of the efforts that must be made to make the project a success.
Figure 4. Goal Calculation Measures of Success
After determining the goal measure of success, determine the scope of the project
using the SIPOC diagram (Figure 5) which can illustrate the scope of the project, because
all supporting elements namely suppliers, inputs, processes, outputs, and customers are
considered and included in the SIPOC diagram.
Diketahui:
1. Nilai rata-rata = 7 hari
2. Nilai performa terbaik = 4 hari
3. Persentase perbaikan = 43%
Nilai selisih =
=
Nilai perbaikan =
=
Sasaran perbaikan =
=
Persentase penurunan =
=
Langkah 1. Menentukan selisih
Perhitungan Sasaran Ukuran Keberhasilan
nilai rata-rata - nilai performa terbaik
7 hari - 4 hari = 3 hari
persentase perbaikan * selisih
Mengurangi waktu penyelesaian proses inspeksi motor listrik di workshop sebesar 42.8%
dari rata-rata 7 hari menjadi 4 hari pada semester I 2022
Langkah 5. Menentukan pernyataan sasaran ukuran keberhasilan
Langkah 4. Menentukan persentase penurunan
Langkah 2. Menentukan nilai perbaikan
Langkah 3. Menentukan sasaran
43% * 3 hari = 1.29 hari
nilai rata-rata - nilai selisih
7 hari - 3 hari = 4 hari
(nilai rata-rata - sasaran perbaikan / nilai rata-rata) * 100%
((7 hari - 4 hari)/7 hari)*100% = 42.8 %
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1686
Figure 5. SIPOC diagram of the inspection process
The two tools above provide a very good understanding to researchers and all
parties involved, namely being able to understand the current state, the target to be
targeted, and who will be involved in the project.
Measure
In this Measure stage, researchers use Process Map tools, Cross-Functional
Flowcharts, Flow Charts, Lean Consumption Maps (LCM), and finally Value-Added
Assessment. From the Process Map in Figure 6 below, researchers increasingly
understand how the inspection process carried out at the UKB Millennium workshop
starts from the initial process to the final process. Broadly speaking, there are four parties
involved directly and interrelated, namely customers, sales teams, workshop teams, and
supplier teams. Furthermore, it also shows that there are five validation processes, where
each validation point is based on the results of interviews and observations of researchers
in the field, there is a high chance of experiencing delays due to the process of waiting
for data or confirmation from other parties before deciding to the next stage of the process.
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1687
Figure 6. Process Map on the motorcycle inspection process in the workshop
Then the initial findings information on the Process Map above is used by
researchers to explore data in the next stage, namely by making a Functional Flowchart
according to Figure 6 below, which clearly shows the process flow to identify or
reconfirm potential delays, rework, excessive inspection and validation and stages that
have the potential to cause system failure. The results of the data from the two tools above
confirm each other and strengthen the confidence of researchers that the motor inspection
process in the workshop has great potential to be used as an area of improvement in the
next stage.
Figure 7. Cross-functional flowchart motor inspection process in the workshop
Customer Sales
Sales
support
Ekspedisi
Workshop admin
support
Operator ws
penerima barang
Teknisi
workshop
Leader/QC Supervisor
Reporting
engineer
Suplier /
subcontractor
Mulai
Mengajukan
permintaan
service motor
Terimasi
permintaan,
konfirmasi
metode
pengiriman
Cek syarat
pengambilan
disite, carikan
ekspedisi
Bongkar &
Kirimkan motor
Terima unit
motor
Mendata unit
motor &
tagging
Ambil unit
motor dari site
& kirimkan ke
workshop
Masukkan ke
WIP plan
Booking di
system dan
terbitkan
dokumen sales
order
Buatkan
dokumen sales
order
Inpeksi motor
secara elektrik/
mekanik
Verifikasi &
approval 1
Verifikasi &
approval 2
Buatkan laporan
inpeksi awal
Verifikasi &
approval
laporan inspeksi
awal, hitungkan
harga repair
Kirimkan harga
jasa, material/
consumable
Terima laporan
inspeksi, review
harga dan
scope. Lalu buat
penawaran
Review laporan
inspeksi, harga,
delivery, lakukan
negosiasi
Terbitkan PO
Terima PO,
booking di
system dan
terbitkan SO
Selesai
1. Customer kontak
sales permintaan
service motor
Mulai
2. Sales info sales
support mengenai
permintaan ini
8. Reporting
engineer buatkan
laporan inspeksi
11. Supervisor kirim
laporan inspeksi,
harga ke sales
14. Customer
review penawaran
sales
11a. Minta informasi
harga ke suplier
atau subcontract
12. Sales review
harga, scope, dan
schedule
13. Sales buat
penawaran ke
customer
15a. Customer
negosiasi (harga)
penawaran sales
15. Customer
terbitkan service
order (PO)
15b. Sales minta
review ke tim
operation
Selesai
3. Customerkirim
unit motor ke
workshop
3a. Sales support
kontak customer cek
syarat disite
4. Motor diterima
tim workshop
3b. Sales support
cari ekspedisi sesuai
syarat customer
5. Sales support
kontak sales dan
buatkan sales order
3c. Ekspedisi ambil
unit di customer &
kirim ke workshop
10. Supervisor
periksa laporan &
hitung harga
7. Tim workshop
inspeksi & isikan
form inspeksi
9. Reporting
engineer kirim
laporan inspeksi
No
Yes
No
Yes
Motor
dikirim
user?
Data
lengkap?
Harga
lengkap?
Harga OK?
Harga &
data OK?
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1688
Furthermore, the researcher entered the stage of describing the Lean Consumption
Map according to Figure 2 in the previous section, the results of which made the
researcher know the total time needed by customers was 2,735 minutes, with value-added
285 minutes (or 10.4%) and non-value added 2450 minutes (or 89.6%). In contrast, the
provider's total time required was 3045 minutes, with value-added 850 minutes (or
27.9%) and non-value-added 2195 minutes (or 72.1%).
Through the data presented by the Lean Consumption Map, important information
is obtained that many activities have a longer processing time, thus affecting other
processes (bottlenecks). For example, from the provider or workshop side, the sub-
process starting from receiving the motorbike in the workshop to waiting for the
customer's witness certainty takes as much as 790 minutes, the next in the sub-process
when the reporting engineer starts making the initial inspection report until finally the
sales send the inspection report to the customer, It took 1120 minutes. On the other hand,
on the customer side, in the sub-process when witnessing in the workshop, it takes 480
minutes.
To further complete this Measure stage, researchers made a Flow Chart according
to Figure 1 in the previous introduction, to better understand the layout and distance, as
well as the process flow when workers work in the workshop room, including carrying
out verification and validation activities for inspection documents. This is very helpful in
the Analyze stage later, which is when determining what potential failures or wastes may
arise due to the layout or due to the many flows of movements of workers in the workshop
that are not effective and efficiently carried out.
Analyze
In this analysis stage, researchers will conduct a problem-identification study and
determine the root cause of the problem and future improvement steps with FMEA
(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) tools. The first step that must be done in this FMEA
is brainstorming related to the potential failures in each sub-process, then assessing
Severity (severity in the event of failure), determining the potential cause of failure,
assessing Occurrence (how often the failure occurs), determining the method and value
of Detection (how much the failure can be detected), make recommendations for
corrective actions, and finally predict the value of the Risk Priority Number (RPN) before
and after the improvement recommendations are made. By general standards, when an
RPN value above 100 is found, the value is considered high and needs to be improved.
The full FMEA data can be seen in the appendix to Table 12).
Based on the data presented in the FMEA, plus consideration of the data presented
in the previous Measure stage, namely Flow Chart data, Process Map, Functional
Flowchart, and LCM, in the end, the researcher decided 4 proposed improvements would
focus on being followed up in the next stage of the process, according to Table 2 below.
Table 1. List of proposed improvements and repair codes
No
Proposed improvements
Code
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1689
1
Create a WA group with customers for job updates,
schedules, daily reports, and inspection videos
S1
2
Inform as soon as possible when finding abnormal damage,
changes in scope, duration, and price
S2
3
Marking motor components and storing all spare parts
S3
4
Ask for a pricelist of materials from vendors, make service
contracts
S4
At this stage, researchers will use several tools, namely the Impact and Effort
Matrix, Lean Consumption Map (After Lean Service), and Value Added Assessment. All
improvement proposals in Table 2 above will then be selected using the Impact and Effort
Matrix method. From the Impact and Effort Matrix (annex Figure 12), it was found that
all improvement proposals were in Zone I and Zone II, which means that this fully
confirms that the proposed improvements can be implemented in the UKB Millennium
Tangerang workshop with not-so-much effort but has a big impact on the side of process
improvement. The next step is to make an estimate that describes the conditions of change
that will occur, namely the estimated value of Value Added Assessment after
improvement with the help of the Lean Consumption Map after Lean Service tool
according to Figure 8 below.
Figure 8. LCM Simulation after Lean Consumption
Figure 8 above shows a simulation of Lean Consumption after Lean Consumption,
where researchers found significant changes both on the customer side and on the
provider side, namely improvements in the value-added activities process. Table 3 below
shows that the total time required by customers to complete this inspection process was
reduced to 1,130 minutes (from 2,735 minutes previously), with a total value-added time
of 300 minutes (or 26.5%) and a total non-value-added time of 830 minutes (or 73.5%).
On the other hand, on the provider side, namely the workshop itself, the total time needed
was also reduced to 2060 minutes (from the previous 3045 minutes), with a total value-
90 menit 8% 70 menit 6% 130 menit 12% 840 menit 74% 1130 menit
(Total Consumer
60 60 120 30
30 10 10 60
20
73.5%
240
10
480
26.5%
195 menit 17% 285 menit 25% 940 menit 83% 640 menit 57% 2060 menit (Total Provider Time)
60 15 60 60
120 60 60 180
62.1%
5 5 120 5
10 25 30 10
10 120 10
20 340 240
37.9%
120 120 30
30 30 5
20 5
40 10
5
50
5
10
5
10
17
SPV review & approve
draft report
18
SPV kirim report-
harga ke sales
19
Sales kirim report-
harga ke customer
11
GL buat report per
inspeksi
16
Reporting engineer
kirim report ke SPV
10
9
Lakukan cleaning dan
heating
14
SPV review draft
report
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (3)
15
Reporting engineer
revisi draft report
Mekanik lakukan
pengukuran mekanik
12
Reporting engineer
buat draft report
2
Sales konfirmasi ke
customer
4
Group leader cek slot
waktu inspeksi
8
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (2)
13
7
Reporting engineer
kirim draft ke SPV
PROVIDER
(Workshop ABB team)
1
Sales koordinasi ke tim
workshop (ws)
3
Terima mesin di
workshop
6
Mekanik lakukan
dismantling
5
Tester lakukan uji
elektrik (1)
6
Kirimkan PO service
CONSUMER
(Industrial company)
1
Komunikasi ke sales
untuk service mesin
2
Kirim mesin ke
workshop
3
Datang witnesst proses
di ws
4
Terima report-harga
dan review
5
Nego harga dan waktu
service
Before lean
service
Non-Value
Added Time
Value Added
Time
Before lean
service
Non-Value
Added Time
Value Added
Time
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1690
added time of 780 minutes (or 37.9%) and a total of non-value added time of 1280
minutes (or 62.1%).
Table 2. Value-Added Assessment Simulation after Lean Consumption
Information
Customer
(Consumption Time)
Provider
(Provision Time)
Total Time
(a)
1130
2060
Value Added
(b)
300
780
Non value Added
(c)
830
1280
% VA
= (b) / (a) * 100%
26.5%
37.9%
% NVA
= (c) / (a) * 100%
73.5%
62.1%
Value to Waste Ratio
= (b) / (c) * 100%
36%
61%
Therefore, the implementation of these improvement proposals is very important to
be carried out immediately to ensure the achievement of the objectives of the Lean
Service project at the UKB Millennium Tangerang workshop.
In lean service programs, the use of DMAIC and LCM is a complementary
combination of each other. Both are excellent at contributing highly to the understanding
of process improvement, as well as providing objective accuracy. The Measure and
Improve stages of LCM can present an overview before and after process improvement
in the workshop to the Lean Service project team. Moreover, the LCM can produce Value
to Waste Ratio data as shown in Table 4 below. This data makes it easier for the project
team to determine the Lean level of a process in the workshop work.
To run, manage, and maintain the continuity of the Lean Consumption program at
the UKB Millennium workshop, namely in the inspection process, three steps are needed,
the first is to start gradually so that all teams involved have the opportunity to fully
understand and accept Lean Consumption as a new culture at work. The second step is
managing the Lean Consumption program using program planning, program
implementation, and program follow-up. The third step is to maintain the continuity of
Lean Consumption in the organization after a department has completed a Lean
Consumption project. It is important to think strategically about how to sustain
improvements and when necessary, spread the spirit of Lean Consumption throughout the
organization.
Table 3. Value to Waste Ratio of electric motor inspection process in
workshop
LCM before Lean Service
Value Added Assessment
Customer
(Consumption Time)
Provider
(Provision Time)
Total Time
(a)
2735
3045
Value Added
(b)
285
850
Non value Added
(c)
2450
2195
% VA
= (b) / (a) * 100%
10.4%
27.9%
% NVA
= (c) / (a) * 100%
89.6%
72.1%
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1691
Value to Waste Ratio
= (b) / (c) * 100%
12%
39%
LCM after Lean Service
Value Added Assessment
Customer
(Consumption Time)
Provider
(Provision Time)
Total Time
(a)
1130
2060
Value Added
(b)
300
780
Non value Added
(c)
830
1280
% VA
= (b) / (a) * 100%
26.5%
37.9%
% NVA
= (c) / (a) * 100%
73.5%
62.1%
Value to Waste Ratio
= (b) / (c) * 100%
36%
61%
Conclusion
Based on previous analysis, researchers concluded that the Lean Service concept
using the DMAIC method and the Lean Consumption Map approach can be applied to
the electric motor inspection process at the UKB Millennium Tangerang workshop. The
concept of Lean Service through LCM simulation after Lean Consumption is applied can
improve the inspection process, which previously the average completion of the
inspection process was 7 days reduced to 4 days according to the KPI target. Then the
value added each increased, on the customer side from 10.4% to 26.5%, and on the
provider side from 27.9% to 37.9%. It also reduced the total time of both parties, namely
on the customer side from 2735 minutes to 1130 minutes, and on the provider side from
3045 minutes to 2060 minutes. This will also provide added value and increase
competitive advantage.
Thus, researchers are also confident that the application of the Lean Service concept
in this service repair workshop can also be applied to other workshop business fields that
have similar processes and organizational characteristics.
Irani Harefa, Edi Hamdi, Tantri Yanuar, Rina Annindita
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1692
Bibliography
Ahlstrom, Par. (2004). Lean service operations: translating lean production principles to
service operations. International Journal of Services Technology and Management,
5(56), 545564. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2004.006284
Arlinghaus, Julia C., & Knizkov, Stephanie. (2020). Lean Maintenance and Repair
Implementation - a Cross-Case Study of Seven Automotive Service Suppliers.
Procedia CIRP, 93, 955964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.144
Bhat, Shreeranga, Gijo, E. V., & Jnanesh, N. A. (2014). Application of Lean Six Sigma
Methodology in the Registration Process of a Hospital. International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, 63(5), 613643.
Delgado, Catarina, Ferreira, Marlene, & Branco, Manuel Castelo. (2010). The
Implementation of Lean Six Sigma in Financial Services Organizations. Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(4), 512523.
Ferdousi, Farhana, & Ahmed, Amir. (2009). an Investigation of Manufacturing
Performance Improvement through Lean Production: A Study on Bangladeshi
Garment Firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(9), 106116.
Fletcher, Jeffrey. (2018). Opportunities for Lean Six Sigma in Public Sector
Municipalities. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(2), 256267.
Gijo, E. V., Antony, Jiju, & Sunder M, Vijaya. (2018). Application of Lean Six Sigma in
IT Support Services a Case Study. TQM Journal, 31(3), 417435.
Gülyaz, Erdoğan, van der Veen, Jack A. A., Venugopal, Venu, & Solaimani, Sam. (2019).
Towards a holistic view of customer value creation in Lean: A design science
approach. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1).
Hadid, Wael, & Mansouri, S. Afshin. (2014). The lean-performance relationship in
services: A theoretical model. International Journal of Operations and Production
Management, 34(6), 750785.
Lee, Sang M., Olson, David L., Lee, Sang Heui, Hwang, Taewon, & Shin, Matt S. (2008).
Entrepreneurial Applications of the Lean Approach to Service Industries. Service
Industries Journal, 28(7), 973987.
Leite, Higor dos Reis, & Vieira, Guilherme Ernani. (2015). Lean philosophy and its
applications in the service industry: A review of the current knowledge. Producao,
25(3), 529541.
LeMahieu, Paul G., Nordstrum, Lee E., & Greco, Patricia. (2017). Lean for Education.
Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 7490.
Radnor, Zoe. (2010). Transferring Lean Into Government. Journal of Manufacturing
Technology Management, 21(3), 411428.
Improvement Of Electric Motor Inspection Process In Service Repair Workshop: With Lean
Consumption Map Approach
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 4, No. 10, October 2023 1693
Silva, Iris Bento da. (2015). Lean Office in Health Organization in the Brazilian Army.
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6(1), 216.
Sunaryanto, Ketut, & T.Y.R., Syah. (2019). Application of Lean Thinking Development :
Case Study over Badan Pendapatan Daerah ( BAPENDA ), South Tangerang Based
on Lean Government. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic, 1(1), 2026.
Sunder, Vijaya, Ganesh, L. S., & Marathe, Rahul R. (2019). Lean Six Sigma in Consumer
Banking an Empirical Inquiry. International Journal of Quality and Reliability
Management, 36(8), 13451369. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2019-0012
Susanti, Barlian, Syah, Tantri Yanuar Rahmat, & Sunaryanto, Ketut. (2020). Lean
consumption implementation for acceleration improvement in executive outpatient
wait time over Hermina hospital Bekasi. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic,
4(1), 4246.
Syah, T. Y. R., Nurohim, A., & Hadi, D. S. (2019). Lean Six Sigma Concept in The
Health Service Process in The Universal Health Coverage of BPJS Healthcare
(Healthcare and Social Security Agency). Proceeding of The 3rd International
Conference on Accounting, Business & Economics, 7188.
Vignesh, V., Suresh, M., & Aramvalarthan, S. (2016). Lean in Service Industries: a
Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
149(1).
Womack, James P., & Jones, Daniel T. (2005). Lean Consumption. Lean Enterprise
Institute, Harvard Business Review.