p-ISSN: 2723-6609 e-ISSN: 2745-5254
Vol. 5, No. 10 October 2024 http://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4647
Analysis of Railway Track Type Selection on the Lahat-
Lubuklinggau Line
Windi Nopriyanto1*, Septiana Widi Asuti2, Puspita Dewi3, Sapto Priyanto4
Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia, Madiun, Indonesia
*Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Keywords: Track Class
Improvement; Track Capacity;
R.54 rails
Currently, the railway line from Lahat to Lubuklinggau uses the R.42
rail type with a crossing power capacity of 2,106 > 5,106 tons/year.
An increase in road class is needed to increase crossing
capacity. This research aims to determine the feasibility and impact
of upgrading the rail type from R.42 to R.54 to improve the
operational efficiency and safety of the Lahat-Lubuklinggau railway
line. In this study, the author uses the railway loading method using
the beam on the elastic foundation (BoEF) concept to calculate rail
permit voltage to ensure that the capacity of the railroad can
accommodate the load of railway traffic. The study results in show
that with the upgrade of the railroad class to class III with the R.54
rail type, this line can transport a load of 5,924,001.60 tons/year, an
increase from 1,838,390.40 tons/year. In addition, the track with the
R.54 rail type also meets the requirements for trains with the largest
load, considering that the allowable voltage (1,097.18 kg/cm²) is
smaller than the previous rail allowable voltage (1,738.14 kg/cm²).
It is estimated that the R.54 rail type has a life resistance of 16-17
years against crossing power without the Babaranjang train and for
9-10 years against crossing power with the Babaranjang train for the
coming year.
Introduction
To improve connectivity, South Sumatra Province is prioritizing the development
of rail transportation modes (Ditjen Perkeretaapian, 2019). By utilizing funding sources
from State Sharia Securities (SBSN) contained in the Budget Implementation List (DIPA)
of the Palembang Class II Railway Engineering Center for the 2020-2021 fiscal year, the
government has construed a railway line connecting Lubuk Linggau and Lahat with a
total length of about 115 kilometers (Ditjen Perkeretaapian, 2019).
The Lahat-Lubuklinggau railway line needs improvements to improve operational
performance and safety after 14 years since it was last updated in 2005. To achieve this
goal, the Palembang Class II Railway Engineering Center has carried out the line
improvement project. It is also planned to increase the frequency of train travel on the
line to meet the need for cargo transportation capacity, especially coal. Demand for coal
transportation services in the Sumatra region continues to trend upward (Sari et al., 2021).
Based on Kusumo research (2021), a coal-only freight train known as Babaranjang uses
Windi Nopriyanto, Septiana Widi Asuti, Puspita Dewi, Sapto Priyanto
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4648
a CC205 locomotive with a very strong attraction. This locomotive can pull up to 60 cars
with a capacity of 50 tons per car, thanks to its axle load of 18 tons. In comparison, the
CC202 locomotive is assigned to serve the Lahat-Lubuklinggau crossing for passenger
and freight transportation, with a maximum axle load of 14 tons.
The Lahat-Lubuklinggau railway line still adopts R.42 type rail, which is
classified as a class IV line with a limited carrying capacity of 2,106 > 5,106
tons/year (Ditjen Perkeretaapian, 2020). With the increase in the capacity of the
Babaranjang railway line, the potential for freight transportation can reach more than 5
million tons per year, considering that each car can load up to 50 tons of goods and a
series of trains can consist of 60 cars. After the revitalization, the classification of
railroads was upgraded to class III, which allowed the rail line to increase the carrying
capacity of 5,106 > 10,106 tons per year by using R.54 type rails. The selection of rail
type is based on calculating the rail structure by considering the rail foundation's
centralized load and elastic properties. So, the amount of tension that occurs depends on
the rail type (Mananoma et al., 2017; Yudistirani et al., 2021). Seeking to determine the
condition of the rails and bearings on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau line, which are very old
and do not meet safety and efficiency standards, revitalization is urgently needed by
replacing larger and sturdier rails and bearings.
Rail transportation plays a crucial role in improving connectivity in South Sumatra
Province, particularly in supporting efficient freight transport. This study examines the
enhancement of rail type on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau railway line, which previously used
R.42 type rail with a crossing capacity of 2,106 to 5,106 tons per year. The main goal of
this research is to replace the rail with the R.54 type, which is expected to increase the
load capacity to 5,924,001.60 tons per year, thereby improving operational efficiency and
track safety.
The novelty of this research lies in its specific approach to increasing crossing
capacity by addressing the unique challenges of railway infrastructure in Indonesia,
particularly in South Sumatra, where infrastructure limitations and increasing demand for
freight transport especially coal-pose significant challenges. Few studies have focused on
upgrading rail types using the "beam on elastic foundation" (BoEF) approach in specific
railway lines in Indonesia. In contrast, similar studies in other countries generally focus
on main railway lines under different economic and geological conditions. This study
provides specific context on how using the BoEF method can offer a solution to the
unique challenges of the Lahat-Lubuklinggau line.
Furthermore, this study explicitly links the selection of track type with the
improvement of operational safety and efficiency. Upgrading the rail type from R.42 to
R.54 is expected not only to increase crossing capacity but also to contribute to enhanced
operational safety. This is crucial given the high demand for coal transport in South
Sumatra. By considering the comprehensive impact on operational efficiency and safety,
this research aims to address the need for railway infrastructure revitalization to support
local economic growth.
Analysis of Railway Track Type Selection on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau Line
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4649
Methods
The research began with data collection to calculate the railroad's crossing
capacity so that the load on the rail could be borne (Pyrgidis, 2022). It is necessary to
know the types of passenger and freight trains that operate on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau
route. With this data, finding the numbers of series on the train will also be possible. Some
of it is also obtained from references to railway engineering and railroad books. The
construction of railway lines depends heavily on how heavy the load will be, how fast the
train will travel, and how often the train will pass. Then, an analysis of the loading of the
railway was carried out. For the determination of the type of rail based on the calculation
of rail dimensions, the assumption that the rail is a beam of infinite length is used (Utomo,
2009). Dengan pembebanan terpusat dan ditumpu oleh struktur yang mempunyai
modulus elastisitas, yang dalam hal ini adalah modulus elastisitas. According to Rosyidi
Rosyidi (2015), the loading of railways uses the concept of Beam on Elastic Foundation
(BoEF) to calculate the stress of railway loading components. Calculating the change in
the load of a moving wheel to a stationary load using the Talbot formula (Munawwarah
& Herijanto, 2020). Here is how to find out the voltage on the rails:
1. Dumping factor
2. Dynamic load calculation using the TALBOT equation
Pd = Ps (1+ 0,01( 5))
3. Calculation of moments due to locomotive load
Ma = 0,85 x
4. Overview of the basic stress on the rails
 

5. Check the base voltage
 󰇛󰇜
6. Plan tension on rails; and


7. Check the voltage σ < Rail clearance voltage (kg/cm²)
󰇛󰇜
In the analysis of rail loading, the tension on the rails in the field will be possible
to determine using the rail tension allowed in PM No.60 of 2012 (Menteri Perhubungan,
2012). Thus, the feasibility of using this type of rail on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau railway
line will be known.
Data Collection Methods
This study adopts a secondary data approach, as Sugiyono (2018) explained,
namely data obtained from other research sources. Secondary data was obtained from
various agencies, including the Palembang Class II Railway Engineering Center,
Windi Nopriyanto, Septiana Widi Asuti, Puspita Dewi, Sapto Priyanto
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4650
responsible for the budget and the implementation of related activities. In addition, the
data also comes from PT. Kereta Api Indonesia is an operator and DED (Detail
Engineering Design) construction consultancy services that plan the track layout design
on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau crossing in 2020. Some other data was obtained from PT.
Indonesian Railways and reference books related to railroad construction. According to
Heryana et al. (2019), secondary data is ready to use because it has been collected and
processed by others. In other words, the researcher only obtains the data indirectly.
Data Analysis Methods
Based on data obtained from construction consulting agencies and services related
to the implementation of road class improvement activities for the Lahat-Lubuklinggau
railway line, as follows:
1. Railway Cross-Force Analysis
Railway crossing power determines the value of the tension on the rails. The goal
is to determine whether the rail components meet the requirements so that it is known if
they need to be replaced (Jaya & Miswanto, 2019). This data was obtained from PT.
Indonesian Railways, this is needed to determine the types of passenger and freight trains
operating on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau crossing. With this data, finding the number of
series on the train will also be possible. Some of it is also obtained from the reference of
railway engineering and railway road books.
2. Railway Load Analysis
The construction of railway lines is highly dependent on the load carried, the
maximum speed of the train, the axle load, and the pattern of railway operation
(Adityadharma et al., 2004; Trimayanita, 2021). The analysis of rail loading is based on
the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM.60 of 2012 concerning
Technical Requirements for Railway Lines as a reference according to the requirements
in the analysis of the structure of the railway, especially the upper structure, namely the
Rail.
Results and Discussion
Result
Railway Network Load Analysis,
On the Lahat-Lubuklinggalu station crossing, the CC202 type locomotive, which
drives passenger and freight trains, is often passed. In the ongoing revitalization activities,
a plan is to strengthen this line by bringing in new trains specifically for transporting coal.
The locomotive to be used is the CC205 type, which has a bogie with 3 axles. The
following explains the calculation of axle load and wheel load on locomotives of type
CC202 and CC205 and their train series.
Table 1. Train Load Calculation (Ton)
Train Type
Train Weight
Gaya Bogie (Pb)
Wlok / 2
Gaya Gandar
(Pg) Pb / 2
Gaya Roda (Pr)
Pg / 2
Lokomotiv CC202
84
42
14
7
Analysis of Railway Track Type Selection on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau Line
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4651
Locomotive
CC205
108
54
18
9
Passenger train
40
20
10
5
Dining Train
41
20,5
10,25
5,125
Freight Train
35
17,5
8,75
4,325
Train Generator
42
21
10,5
5,25
From the explanation above, it can be determined that the CC205 type locomotive
with 3 axles has the largest load, which is 108 tons. The bogie load is 54 tons, the load
per axle is 18 tons, and the load on the wheels is 9 tons.
Railway Cross-Force Analysis
1. Calculation of Railway Cross Power Load
Table 2. Calculation of Cross-Power Load
Trip KAl
Daily Cross Power Load (Tonnage)
Locom
otive
Passenger
Carriage
Gb.
Makan
Gb.
Pembang
kit
Gb.
Katel
Gb.
Bong
kar
KAl Executive
Business
Passenger
164
560
82
84
-
-
KAl Economy
Passenger
164
480
82
84
-
-
KAl Fuel
84
-
-
-
700
KAl
Babaranjang
108
-
-
-
-
3.000
Total
520
1.040
164
168
700
3.000
Grand Totals
5,592 tons/day
From the results of the calculation of the Cross Power Load on the train on the Lahat-
Lubuklinggau Route, then:
a. Cross-Transport Capacity next year (without long-range coal trains): Passenger
Train + Freight Train is 2,484 tons/day.
b. Cross-transport capacity in the coming year (with long-range coal trains):
Passenger Train + Freight Train + Long-Range Coal Train reaches 5,592 tons/day.
2. Analisa Daya Lintas Berdasarkan Tonase Lintas
Cross Carrying Capacity is the number of transportations that passes through a
crossing in one year, with the following calculation formula:
TE = Tp + (Kb x Tb) + (K1 x T1)
T = 360 x S x TE
a. If the Cross-Transport Capacity in the coming year (without Long Series Coal
trains)
Windi Nopriyanto, Septiana Widi Asuti, Puspita Dewi, Sapto Priyanto
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4652
TE = 1372+ (1,3 x 2072) + (1,4 x 412)
at = 4.642,40 to/green
So, for the annual Daya Lintas is calculated as follows:
T = 360 x S x TE
T = 360 x 1,1 x 4.642,40
T = 1,838,390.40 tons/year
b. Prediction of Cross Transport Capacity (with Babaranjang Train)
TE = 1372 + (1,3 x 3892) + (1,4 x 520)
TE = 14,959.60 tons/day
So, the annual cross-annual capacity is calculated as follows:
T = 360 x S x TE
T = 360 x 1,1 x 14959,60
T = 5.924.001,60 from/bottom
The calculations' results show that the normal cross-transport capacity (without
the Babaranjang train) is 1,838,390.40 tons/year, while the cross-transport capacity with
the Babaranjang train reaches 5,924,001.60 tons/year. Thus, it is included in the category
of railroad class III with a maximum speed of 100 km/h (Table 2 Rail Road Class) and a
cross-transport capacity of 5.10⁶ - 10.10⁶ million tons/year.
Life Resistance Analysis
Table 3. Calculation of Rail Life Durability R. 42 and R. 54
Account
Formula
Results at R 42
Results at R 54
Dumping Factor
λ =
0,011185295
0,0097771571
Dynamis Load
Pd = Pr (1+ 0,01(
5))
15.541,92 kg
15.541,92 kg
Moment Due to
Locomotive Load
Mal = 0,85
347.373,94 kg/cm²
337.793,28 kg/cm²
Base Voltage on Rails
=
1.725,20 kg/cm²
1094,31 kg/cm²
Check Base Voltage
<
1.725,20 kg/cm² >
1.410 kg/cm² (tidak ok)
1094,31 kg/cm² < 1097
kg/cm² (ok)
Tension on Rails
1.738,14 kg/cm²
1.097,18 kg/cm²
Check Allowable
Voltage
<
1.738,14 kg/cm² >
1.663 kg/cm² (tidak ok)
1.097,18 kg/cm² <
1.663 kg/cm² (ok)
Analysis of Railway Track Type Selection on the Lahat-Lubuklinggau Line
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4653
Based on the calculation results, the planned basic voltage on the R.42 rail is
1,725.20 kg/cm², greater than the permitted voltage of 1,410 kg/cm², so it is not eligible
for use. The voltage that occurred was also greater than the permitted voltage, which was
1,738.14 kg/cm² > 1,663 kg/cm². Therefore, the old rail of type R.42 is not feasible and
needs to be replaced with a stronger rail.
On the contrary, the calculation results on the R.54 rail show that the planned basic
voltage of 1094.31 kg/cm² is less than the permitted voltage of 1097 kg/cm², meeting the
set conditions. The voltage that occurs is also smaller than the allowable voltage for the
R.54 type rail road class, which is 1,097.18 kg/cm² < 1,663 kg/cm². Therefore, R. 54-type
rails are feasible to use.
Conclusion
Based on the results of the research on the revitalization of the Lahat-Lubuklinggau
railway line, the current cross-transport capacity is only around 1,838,390.40 tons per
year is expected to increase significantly to 5,924,001.60 tons per year with the operation
of the Babaranjang coal train: The construction conditions on the railroad show that the
R.42 rail is not suitable for use because the voltage that occurs (1,738.14 kg/cm²) exceeds
the allowable voltage (1,663 kg/cm²), while the R.54 rail is qualified because the voltage
that occurs (1,097.18 kg/cm²) is less than the allowable voltage, with the durability of the
R.54 rail estimated at 16-17 years without the Babaranjang train and 9-10 years with the
Babaranjang train; It is recommended that further research include a study of the
construction of the lower part of the railroad such as soil carrying capacity, subgrades,
ballasts, and supporting accessories so that the planning results are more accurate.
Bibliography
Adityadharma, C., Joewono, T. B., & Santosa, W. (2004). Kajian Sistem Manajemen
Pemeliharaan Jalan Rel Daerah Operasional 2 Bandung: Studi Kasus Distrik 23C
Kiaracondong. Jurnal Transportasi, 4(1), 3746.
Ditjen Perkeretaapian. (2019, February 2). Moda Transportasi Kereta Api, Moda
Angkutan Umum Massal Pilihan di Perkotaan. Kementerian Perhubungan:
Direktorat Jenderal Perkeretaapian. https://djka.dephub.go.id/moda-transportasi-
kereta-api-moda-angkutan-umum-massal-pilihan-di-perkotaan-1
Ditjen Perkeretaapian. (2020). Laporan Tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Perkeretaapian.
https://djka.kemenhub.go.id/laporan-tahunan-direktorat-jenderal-perkeretaapian-
tahun-2020
Heryana, N., Putro, A. N. S., Erliyani, I., Dewi, E. N. F., Supriadi, A., Nurdin, A. M., &
Dwi, R. (2023). Prinsip Sistem Operasi. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Jaya, F. H., & Miswanto, M. (2019). Evaluasi Struktur Atas Komponen Jalan Rel
Berdasarkan Passing Tonage (Studi Kasus: Jalan Rel Lintas Tanjung Karang-Bekti).
Tapak, 8(1), 3345.
Windi Nopriyanto, Septiana Widi Asuti, Puspita Dewi, Sapto Priyanto
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4654
Kusumo, R. (2021, October 15). Merayakan 35 Tahun KA Babaranjang, Kisah Kereta
Api Terpanjang di Indonesia . Goodnewsfromindonesia.
https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2021/10/15/merayakan-35-tahun-ka-
babaranjang-kisah-kereta-api-terpanjang-di-indonesia
Mananoma, F., Sutrisno, A., & Tangkuman, S. (2017). Perancangan Poros Transmisi
Dengan Daya 100 HP. Jurnal Poros Teknik Mesin Unsirat, 6(1), 19.
Menteri Perhubungan. (2012). Peraturan Menteri Nomor 60 Tentang Persyaratan Teknis
Jalur Kereta Api. Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia.
Munawwarah, C., & Herijanto, W. (2020). Perancangan Jalan Rel dan Geometri Trase
dari Ponorogo Slahung untuk Reaktivasi. Jurnal Teknik ITS (Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh Nopember), 9(1), E64E69.
Pyrgidis, C. N. (2022). Railway Transportation Systems Design, Construction and
Operation (Second Edition). CRC Press.
Rosyidi, S. A. P. (2015). Rekayasa Jalan Kereta Api. Lembaga Penelitian, Publikasi &
Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP3M) dan Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Sari, W. N., Nadi, M. A. B., & Ridho, A. M. (2021). Perencanaan Geometri Jalan Rel
Trase Bakauheni-Sidomulyo. Journal of Science and Applicative Technology, 5(1),
148. https://doi.org/10.35472/jsat.v5i1.407
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan Staistika untuk Penelitian
R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
Trimayanita, D. (2021). Evaluasi Beban Kendaraan Terhadap Derajat Kerusakan Dan
Umur Sisa Jalan (Studi Kasus: Jalan Balai Raja-Duri) [Universitas Islam Riau].
http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/9548
Utomo, S. H. T. (2009). Jalan Rel. Beta Offset.
Yudistirani, S. A., Diniardi, E., Basri, H., & Ramadhan, A. I. (2021). Analisa Keausan
dan Faktor Keamanan Keluar Rel pada Kereta Api Lokomotif. Jurnal Teknologi,
13(2), 209216.