pISSN: 2723 - 6609 e-ISSN: 2745-5254
Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 http://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4561
The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating
online learning outcomes: Meta-analysis study
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani
1*
, Andi Muhammad Darlis
2
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
1
, IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka
Belitung, Indonesia
2
*Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Keywords: effectiveness
google forms;
assessment & evaluation;
meta-analysis.
The use of Google Forms as a learning tool in certain
subjects is massively used in several schools because of its
efficiency. This research aims to identify, classify, and
observe literature, synthesize several studies that have been
carried out, analyze the contributions that have been made,
and propose related research updates. This study uses a
methodology supported by a research approach,
documentation, and procedural models from systematic
literature review and data analysis using quantitative and
qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. The results of
this study show the effectiveness of Google Forms on the
assessment and evaluation of student learning outcomes,
which from the table has proven that there are 36 studies
(90%) that agree that the use of Google Forms has a positive
or effective influence on success in assessing and evaluating
learning outcomes. This conclusion underscores the
importance of digital marketing in the modern technology
era. Digital marketing allows businesses to effectively reach
global audiences through social media, SEO, and content. In
this study, it was seen that a good digital strategy can
increase brand awareness and customer loyalty. By utilizing
proper data analysis, companies can optimize their digital
marketing campaigns for better results. In conclusion, digital
marketing is the key to winning the competition in an
increasingly competitive market.
Introduction
The development of technology is something that is often discussed by the
academic and scientific community in its combination with education, the combination
of the two has an important role in developing the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of
students. One of the uses of technology or Information, Technology, and Communication
(ITC) in the world of education is Google Forms. ITC provides facilities that are easy and
accessible to students of various levels of education (Mawardi & Budiningsih, 2023).
There are a small number of studies or studies investigating the effectiveness of
Google Forms as a tool in assessing and evaluating learning outcomes, but the average
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani, Andi Muhammad Darlis
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4562
results of these studies have a small effect because they have a small sample size,
according to (Setiawan & Phillipson, 2019) a small research sample size cannot be used
to generalize the effects of variables (Google Forms), to address this problem, there is a
need for a further research effort investigating the effectiveness of Google Forms as a tool
for assessing and evaluating learning outcomes. Meta-analysis studies to develop a better
estimate of the magnitude of the Google Forms effect. This meta-analysis study was taken
because this study is a type of retrospective observational study where the researcher
makes a recapitulation of the data without manipulating it.
(Nurfadillah, 2023) PT. Mulia Karya Inovasi said that Google Forms is a product
of many Google products. It is an application for creating web-based forms and collecting
answers online. Google Forms allows users to create online forms to enter data, such as
surveys, questionnaires, questionnaires, or sign-up form sheets. Google Forms can create
and send surveys or questionnaires to students or others, and can also collect such
information easily and efficiently. Google Forms also has an auto-correction feature that
can score the answers to questions in the questionnaire. This feature makes the
questionnaire in Google Forms a supporting tool for learning process activities.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, learning and teaching activities can only be
carried out online. The use of Google Forms as a learning tool in certain subjects is
massively used in several schools because of its efficiency. The use of Google Forms in
learning activities provides impact and benefits in terms of effectiveness, efficiency,
attractiveness, and display design. For teachers, it is very helpful to have a Google Form
in terms of cost, time, and energy. The students themselves, become more interested,
enthusiastic, and active and do not become negative.
It is undeniable that Google Forms itself has its drawbacks, according to (Karaman,
2011) the lack of supervision from the instructor indicates that students can easily cheat
in answering quiz questions, there are several ways to minimize this action by giving time
limits to students in answering each question item. Another thing that must be taken into
account by the test maker is that the availability of a stable internet connection also needs
to be taken into account.
In recent years there has been a considerable increase in various research related to
the competencies that future teachers must achieve to utilize ICT in teaching There is no
doubt that technology is changing the purpose and direction of education (Van de
Oudeweetering & Voogt, 2018). However, it should be noted that this study aims to
identify, classify, and observe the literature, to be able to synthesize some of the research
that has been carried out, analyze the contributions that have been made, and propose
related research updates. In this sense, this systematic review study has the main objective
of identifying the main themes and contributions that have been reported in scientific
articles on the use of Google Forms in the period 2017-2022. This research focuses on
the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes using Google Forms.
The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating online learning outcomes: Meta-
analysis study
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4563
Method
The study uses a methodology supported by a documentation research approach
and a procedural model of a systematic literature review with topics that are appropriate
to the effectiveness of Google Forms in the assessment and evaluation of learning
outcomes. In this study, we will examine the effectiveness of Google Forms in learning
outcome assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes. Article eligibility criteria. Data
analysis uses quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. After the focus
of the research becomes clear, a simple research instrument will be developed, which is
expected to complement the data and compare the data that has been found previously.
The data collection technique will use documentation techniques. The population
in this study is all written documents regarding research that examines the use of Google
Forms in the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes in journals published by
Garba Rujukan Digital (GARUDA). The written documents are in the form of 177 journal
articles and after being selected only 40 articles meet the criteria. The research sample
was taken using the Purposive Sampling technique. This is because the data or
information to be obtained from the sample is determined based on its suitability to the
theme of this research. The data analysis used is quantitative data analysis with
percentages and qualitative data analysis for the data from the narrative study of the
research encountered. Articles that will be involved in research are articles from research
that have the following criteria: 1) Articles published in the last 5 years; 2) Publication of
articles indexed in Garuda journals; 3) The research variable is cognitive. Affective and
psychomotor domains; 4) The research population is elementary, junior high school, and
high school, students and educators. There were 177 articles found initially related to
Assessment and evaluation using Google Forms. The articles were filtered and finally, 40
articles were selected that were eligible for analysis.
Table 1
The background information of reviewed articles
It
Authors
Publication
Language
Country
1
(Agustin Anggi et al.,
2017)
Indonesian
Indonesian
2
(D. Setiawan & Hasymi
Somaida, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
3
(Badi’atul Azmina et al.,
2017)
English
Indonesian
4
(Nugroho, 2018)
Indonesian
Indonesian
5
(Radyuli et al., 2019)
Indonesian
Indonesian
6
(Amalia, 2019)
Indonesian
Indonesian
7
(Prabaningtias, 2018)
Indonesian
Indonesian
8
(Maulidiansyah, 2018)
Indonesian
Indonesian
9
(Kholis et al., 2020)
Arabic
Indonesian
10
(Thohir & Muslimah,
2020)
English
Indonesian
11
(Azis & Shalihah, 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
12
(Hadianti et al., 2021)
English
Indonesian
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani, Andi Muhammad Darlis
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4564
13
(Gusvita et al., 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
14
(Munawaroh et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
15
(Hakim’s & Safi`i, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
16
(Rahmadi, 2021)
English
Indonesian
17
(Hanafiah et al., 2020)
English
Indonesian
18
(Hariono et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
19
(Nashrullah, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
20
(Bafadal & Triansyah,
2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
21
(Abdin et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
22
(Masrur, 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
23
(Aryanti, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
24
(Rohimat, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
25
(Nainggolan & Rohman,
2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
26
(Tausih & Marno, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
27
(Utami, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
28
(Nofitasari & Ahsani,
2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
29
(Marifa et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
30
(Ngafifah, 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
31
(Sibua & Amiroh, 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
32
(Nst et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
33
(Krisnawati, 2018)
Indonesian
Indonesian
34
(Sahlani & Agung, 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
35
(Karollina et al., 2021)
Indonesian
Indonesian
36
(Sumbawa et al., 2022)
Indonesian
Indonesian
37
(Anggraeni, 2022)
Indonesian
Indonesian
38
(Rinaldi et al., 2022)
English
Indonesian
39
(Homework et al., 2021)
English
Indonesian
40
(Ardiansyah, 2020)
Indonesian
Indonesian
A total of 177 journals that published about the use of Google Forms as a tool in
assessing and evaluating learning outcomes at GARUDA were taken. After being selected
for the suitability for this research, 40 previous research journals apply Google Forms.
According to the data in the research journal, almost all research journal publications use
Indonesian, although 7 studies use English and 1 study uses Arabic as the publication
language of the research journal. And the entirety of the research journals are carried out
in Indonesia.
Results and Discussion
The study found that publications about the use of Google Forms in research have
increased in recent years. This systematic review was carried out during the period
between 2017 and 2022. The highest number of publications was found between 2020
and 2021. In this sense, the possibility of using Google Forms that year increased due to
the Covid 19 pandemic which implemented learning and teaching activities have to be
online.
The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating online learning outcomes: Meta-
analysis study
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4565
Figure 1 Number of publications on the effectiveness of using Google Forms in assessment
and evaluation
The following is an analysis and search of several bibliometrics from GARUDA
that researches Google forms and categories that are generally related followed by Online
Learning Assessment, Evaluation, and Assessment Instruments.
Table 2
Bibliometrik berdasarkan kata kunci
No
Frequency
Presented
1
12
30%
2
10
25%
3
4
10%
4
3
8%
5
2
5%
6
2
5%
7
1
3%
8
1
3%
9
1
3%
10
1
3%
11
1
3%
12
1
3%
13
1
3%
40
100%
Meta-Analysis Based on Research Objectives
The objectives of the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes using Google
Forms include: investigating, describing, and developing and improving. Based on a
study of 40 E-journal articles, the following data can be produced in the following table
3:
2
4
2
13
16
3
0
5
10
15
20
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani, Andi Muhammad Darlis
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4566
Table 3
Research objectives in the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes using Google
Forms
No
Research objectives
Frequency
Presented
1
investigation
18
45%
2
Describe
16
40%
3
Develop & improve
6
5%
sum
40
100%
Meta-analysis by population/sample
The population/sample used in the research on the assessment and evaluation of
learning outcomes using Google Forms which is the subject of the research is from
various circles from elementary education to higher education from several schools and
universities, but some do not take samples because the journals published are only in the
form of literature analysis. Based on a study of 40 E-journals on the assessment and
evaluation of learning outcomes using Google Forms, the people who were used as a
population/sample can be seen in Table 4.
Table 4
Population / Sample in the assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes using
Google Forms
N
o
Population / Sample
Frequency
Presented
1
SMP
12
30%
2
Student
7
18%
3
SMA
6
15%
4
SD
5
13%
5
Guru
4
10%
6
Teachers & Students
3
8%
7
None
3
8%
sum
40
100%
Based on Table 4, the population/sample in this reviewed article mostly uses junior
high school children (SMP) in literature study research, there are 12 studies (30%). The
application of research using research subjects at the junior high school level is widely
applied because of the ease of controlling research subjects. In the research subjects at
the junior high school level, respondents can easily follow instructions.
Meta-analysis based on research methodology and design.
Table 5
Methodology/Design in assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes using Google
Forms
No
Methodologies/Design
Frequency
Presentable
1
Qualitative Descriptive
21
52,5%
2
R&D
7
17,5%
3
Quantitative Descriptive
2
5%
4
Quasi Experimental
2
5%
5
survey
2
5%
6
Kuantitatif (Experiment)
1
2,5%
The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating online learning outcomes: Meta-
analysis study
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4567
7
Evaluative
1
2,5%
8
Classroom Action Research (PTK)
1
2,5%
9
Pre Eksperimental (one-shot case
study)
1
2,5%
10
Quantitative
1
2,5%
11
Mix Method
1
2,5%
sum
40
100%
Analyzing the methodology and design of the research that has been used, Table 5
provides information about the use of methodology and design in a very formative article.
From the initial review, it can be seen that 52.5% of the articles used qualitative
descriptive research, this indicates that half of the articles used qualitative descriptive
research. Then followed by Research & Development (R&D) 17.5%.
Meta-analysis of assessment and evaluation research results using Google Forms
Table 6
Hasil penelitian dalam penelitian penilaian dan evaluasi hasil belajar menggunakan
Google Forms
N
o
The results of assessment and
evaluation research using Google
forms
Frequency
Presented
Positive
1
Effective
17
42,5%
2
Usable
6
15%
3
Recommended
6
15%
4
Effective & High Interest
1
2,5%
5
Effective & smooth
1
2,5%
6
Positive influence
1
2,5%
7
Highly effective
1
2,5%
8
Very practical
1
2,5%
9
There is a significant influence
1
2,5%
10
useful
1
2,5%
Negative
11
enough
1
2,5%
12
Not effective enough
1
2,5%
13
Not yet maximum
1
2,5%
14
Less effective
1
2,5%
sum
40
100%
Tebel 6 has answered this research question about whether there is an influence of
the application of Google Forms in assessment and evaluation activities. The results of
this study can be seen in the effectiveness of Google Forms on the assessment and
evaluation of student learning outcomes, which from the table has proven that there are
36 studies (90%) that agree that the use of Google Forms has a positive or effective
influence on success in assessing and evaluating learning outcomes. Meanwhile, 4 other
studies (10%) stated that the use of Google Forms is still less effective.
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani, Andi Muhammad Darlis
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4568
Conclusion
The use of Google Forms as a learning medium has been well designed, and this
media will play an effective role in analyzing the results of student grades and also an
educational tool for students and educators (audiences). Then it makes it easier for
educators to carry out learning and assessment activities. With its appearance and use that
is quite simple and flexible, it can make students interested so that it helps students
understand the learning material presented. The flexibility is that it can be opened
anywhere they want, of course by using their gadgets. So that it can improve learning
outcomes for students. However, there are still often weaknesses in the use of this tool,
namely difficulties in accessing the internet and other problems that are often experienced
by students. It's a good idea before using the Google form tool, educators must ensure
that their students can use this tool in terms of its use and access to minimize students
who cannot use and run this Google form tool. The results of this meta-analysis research
like the results of other meta-analysis research have several limitations. First, the article
is only sourced from GARUDA which is a scientific paper based in Indonesia that
replicates if this meta-analytical study uses articles that are only relevant in Indonesia.
Secondly, this meta-analysis study is a synthesis of various kinds of nature research and
is not systematically the same as other studies, therefore, it cannot guarantee strong
conclusions. Third, the overall findings of the meta-analysis are often limited by the
quality of the main studies. Third, cultural influences, including various ethnic
backgrounds, are neglected.
Regarding the recommendations for research, from a perspective to advance the
development of new studies with a mixed methodological approach that provides
scientific knowledge, it is necessary to understand more holistically, the reality,
limitations, challenges, and trends regarding the evolution of the use of ITC i.e. Google
Forms in the process of learning and teaching activities in the context of assessment and
evaluation of learning outcomes and, at the same time, investigated studies related to ITC
and Google Forms, based on the context in which they were found. Other factors relevant
for the development of future studies include the opportunity to strategically analyze the
strengths, weaknesses, setbacks, and opportunities that higher education institutions
present in their educational models, with their pedagogical and technological innovation
processes, in the face of contemporary challenges of teacher training. Curriculum
management, technological facilities, and educational innovation strategies in social
technology education.
The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating online learning outcomes: Meta-
analysis study
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4569
Bibliography
Abdin, A., Safiuddin, A., & Kasman, K. (2021). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Google Form
Berbasis Online sebagai Alat Tes Tertulis Belajar Fisika pada Masa Pandemi
Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 110.
Anggraeni, W. (2022). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Materi Tekanan Zat dengan
Metode Penemuan Berbasis Lembar Kerja Siswa di Google Form pada Siswa Kelas
VIII B SMP Negeri 2 Bangsalsari Jember. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 5(1), 6777.
Aryanti, N. N. S. (2021). Artikel Efektifitas Google Form Sebagai Media Evaluasi Di
Masa Pandemi. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 329342.
Azis, T. N., & Shalihah, N. M. (2020). Pengembangan evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis
Google Form. Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 5465.
Bafadal, M. F., & Triansyah, A. (2020). Google Form: Alternatif Penilaian Pendidikan
Jasmani Saat Covid-19. Science Tech: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi,
6(2), 4857.
Gusvita, A., Ritonga, M., & Nasrul, W. (2020). Penggunaan Google Form Sebagai Media
Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pai Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Batang Anai. Al-
Muaddib: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Keislaman, 5(2), 224234.
Hanafiah, H., Priyanda, R., & Fadhelina, N. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Google
Form Assisted Student Worksheets in Increasing Learning Independence and
Student Mathematic Communication Skills in SMP Negeri 5 Langsa. Budapest
International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and
Social Sciences, 3(4), 30913092.
Hariono, I., Wiryokusumo, I., & Fathirul, A. N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen
Penilaian Kognitif Berbasis Google Form Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Kajian
Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 5768.
Karaman, S. (2011). Examining the effects of flexible online exams on students’
engagement in e-learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(3), 259.
Krisnawati, E. (2018). Pemanfaatan google form sebagai kuis online mata kuliah
trigonometri. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 4(1), 61
67.
Mawardi, D. N., & Budiningsih, C. A. (2023). Blended Learning Effect on Mathematical
Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d’Information, 28(1).
Nurfadillah, N. (2023). Teachers’and Students’perception Toward The Use Of Google
Form As English Language Test Media In Sman 5 Sidrap. Iain Parepare.
Andi Abdurrahman Manggaberani, Andi Muhammad Darlis
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 10, October 2024 4570
Setiawan, H., & Phillipson, S. (2019). The effectiveness of Game-Based Science
Learning (GBSL) to improve students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis of
current research from 2010 to 2017. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education),
5(2), 152168.
Van de Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and
enactment of twenty‐first century competences: exploring dimensions for new
curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116133.