Safira, I G A Lokita Purnamika Utami, Ni Komang Arie Suwastini
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 8, August 2024 3672
percentage. Indonesia is one of the countries with schools in rural areas because, based
on the data, Indonesia still has some areas that people need help to reach. Some schools
in rural areas had difficulties applying technology because of the limited facilities.
Unfortunately, ICT and the internet can deliver change for students during the
teaching process. Studies showed that implementing ICTs in rural areas gives students
and teachers new resources and improves the effectiveness of learning outcomes (Hasin
& M Nasir, 2021; Zul et al., 2020). On the other hand, the government still struggles to
implement ICT. We can see from the rural situation, which did not have technology in
the class. The result is less satisfying and unresponsive compared to the schools in urban
areas (Aruleba & Jere, 2022). Other than the lack of technology, the main problem is that
rural teachers most likely need to receive adequate training and teaching skills. The
increase of ICT has the excellent potential for rural communities to exchange past points
of view, have a more leisurely life, and have sound education development if they can
maximise the training of teachers index to perform using technology during the teaching
process (Davies, 2021).
In comparison, the benefits and some challenges between urban and rural schools
are mostly similar. They had the main obstacles when discussing the teacher's role and
technology facilities. Some urban and rural schools still need help with the government's
facilities, and the teachers need more technology skills (Champa, Rochsantiningsih, &
Kristiana, 2021). However, some of the studies mentioned the same result when they
compared the implementation of rural and urban schools. Although they both have
positive awareness about the technology, regarding the frequency of teaching and student
delivery, teachers in urban areas had significantly better experiences and performances
than those in rural schools (Fitriana & Purnamasari, 2021).
The Digital divide between rural and urban in the EFL Context
The term digital divide developed in the mid-1990s in the United States. It was first
published by the US Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunication and
Information Administration in 1999, which caused much confusion in the use of
technology (Van Dijk, 2017). Access to technology adaptation in that era was minimal
for many people, especially students and teachers. In the meantime, the nature of the
digital divide has been discussed as theoretically descriptive, especially in some rural
areas that lack digital access characteristics (Ariansyah, Anandhita, & Sari, 2019);
(Kuputri, 2020). For some reason, the main conditions of the digital divide have only
focused on technology and internet use. The bottom line is that the digital divide is a new
challenge for social and world aspects, specifically in education, which already relies on
technology and digital use and almost happens in rural areas.
Generally, a rural area is located outside the towns and cities and has few people.
From a geographic perspective, a rural area is located far away from the city, which makes
the cities' development in terms of health, water, education, and other facilities less than
the average percentage. Indonesia is one of the countries that have schools located in rural
areas because, based on the data, Indonesia still has some areas that people cannot reach
easily (Vito et al., 2020). Meanwhile, Welsh and Swain (2020) define urban areas in