Ni Nengah Dwi Dharmayanthi, Benny Djaja, Maman Sudirman
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 7, July 2024 3162
agreement due to a breach of promise not to implement the contents of the agreement.
Furthermore, default is associated with circumstances that due to negligence, the debtor
cannot fulfil the achievements that have been agreed upon in the agreement outside of the
existence of force majeure.
Default is different from a force majeure situation. Force majeure is a situation
where the debtor is unable to fulfil his achievements or obligations to the creditor after
the conclusion of the agreement, so that the debtor can not be blamed and is not obliged
to bear the risk and the debtor does not predict at the time of the agreement the
consequences of circumstances beyond the debtor's control, such as earthquakes,
tsunamis, and so on. The elements of a compelling state can be summarized as follows:
1. An unexpected opportunity.
2. Accountability is not mandatory for debtors.
3. The absence of bad faith from the debtor.
4. There are unintended circumstances for the debtor.
5. A situation that makes the debtor unable to carry out his achievements.
6. If the achievement is carried out, then it will be banned.
One example of a default provision that requires a renegotiation of the contract is
related to the contract of work and mineral and coal mining. The renegotiation of the work
contract is due to criticism related to the work contract where financial losses for the state
are caused by the existence of the work contract, especially related to the amount of taxes
and royalties (contributions) that apply to investors. The viewpoint brought by investors
is that the renegotiation of a work contract as a purely civil contract has a voluntary nature
so it is based on the voluntariness of each party to agree to change the content of the work
contract through the process of renegotiation of the work contract. The government, on
the other hand, is of the view that the renegotiation of work contracts as a civil public
contract has a mandatory nature. This difference in practice can hinder notaries from
participating in contract renegotiation.
Notaries as public officials, based on Article 1 number 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014
concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Notary Position have
the authority to make authentic deeds related to all acts, agreements, and determinations
required for laws and regulations and (which are desired) by interested parties to be stated
in authentic deeds to ensure the certainty of the date of making the deed, The storage of
the deed, the giving of the grose, the copy and the quotation of the deed, as a whole, as
long as the deed is not also assigned or omitted to other officials or other persons
prescribed by law (Nurlaela, 2020).
The notary to carry out his responsibilities, referring to the law, in this case, are the
conditions for the validity of the agreement regulated by Article 1320 of the Civil Code,
as (1) made in the form prescribed by law, (2) made in the presence of an authorized
official, (3) a deed formed by or in the presence of a public official authorized for it and
in the place where the deed is made (Purnayasa, 2018). Moral responsibility for notaries
including honesty, thoroughness and neutrality of notaries in making contract deeds is