pISSN: 2723 - 6609 e-ISSN: 2745-5254
Vol. 5, No. 6 June 2024 http://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2907
Analysis of the Causes of Audit Delay in IDX30 Companies
on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX)
Shinta Amalia
1*
, Hermawan
2
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia
1*
2
*Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Keywords: Operational
Complexity; Quality of
Financial Reporting;
Compliance Level.
The publication of financial statements has been regulated
by the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and is a company
obligation. Although there are regulations regarding the
maximum time for the publication of audited financial
statements, many companies still delay submitting these
financial statements. A similar situation also occurs with
companies classified under the IDX30 on the Indonesia
Stock Exchange (IDX). This study explores whether the
sector, profitability, and profit and loss of the company
influence audit delay in IDX30 companies. This study uses
a quantitative approach and purposive sampling technique
for sample selection. The study population includes 30
IDX30 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
from 2018-2022. The study results indicate that the sector,
profit and loss, and company profitability positively
influence audit delay in IDX30 companies.
Introduction
In the assessment of the prestige of a company, one of them can be seen from its
financial performance (Gustini, 2020). Financial performance can be seen in the financial
statements made by the company every quarter and is the basis for investors to predict
the company's future survival (Adhika Wijasari & Ary Wirajaya, 2021). The publication
of financial statements by public companies is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the
Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 51/POJK.03/2017 concerning the
application of sustainable finance for financial service institutions, issuers, and public
companies, where financial statements must be submitted no later than 120 days after the
closing of the books or at the end of the fourth month (Louwers, Blay, & Sinason, 2018).
The determination of these rules has not been maximally implemented by companies
listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). In the financial world, the delay of a
company in reporting its financial statements promptly is called an audit delay
(Rahmadhani & Alexander, 2023).
Audit delay is a phenomenon in the accounting field where there is a delay in
completing an audit of a company's financial statements (Hermawan & Suzan, 2018).
This can be caused by various factors, including the complexity of company transactions,
Shinta Amalia, Hermawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2908
lack of human or financial resources, regulatory changes, or internal problems in the audit
process itself. The impact of audit delays can be significant, especially regarding investor
confidence in the credibility and quality of the company's financial statements. A study
(Indriani, 2020) found that audit delays can negatively impact stock prices, as investors
tend to feel uncertain and hesitant about delayed financial information. Therefore,
company management and auditors must work together to reduce audit delays as much
as possible by increasing efficiency in the audit process and identifying and overcoming
obstacles that cause such delays.
A previous study conducted (Ulita & Romdioni, 2019) stated that the variables of
company size, company age, profitability, solvency, profit and loss, and KAP size
simultaneously had a significant effect on audit delay in IDX-listed property and real
estate sector companies in 2018-2020. (Nurrahmani, Handayani, & Nusa, 2022) their
research stated that the company's profit and loss variables and bankruptcy prediction did
not affect the audit delay, while there were other variables, namely the type of industry
that affected the audit delay in the LQ45 company case study listed on the IDX in 2017-
2022. The profitability and solvency factors have been analyzed previously by (Liwe,
Manossoh, & Mawikere, 2018) and (Kurniawan & Laksito, 2015). They found that these
factors influence audit delay. Previous research by (Supadmo & and Arifin, 2020) and
Puspita (2017) also revealed that the company's operating profit and loss had a significant
influence on audit delay, although Wulandari's (2017) findings showed otherwise.
According to IDX Regulation Kep-307 / JSX / 07-2003 2003, IH number, in
addition to the declining relevance of financial statements, delays in submitting financial
statements also have the potential to result in companies being sanctioned by the IDX.
The sanctions can vary from warnings to suspension of securities trading from the
company in question, with fines as one possibility. Given the importance of timeliness in
influencing the essential quality of financial statements, researchers are interested in
exploring the factors that can affect audit delay. Although previous studies have examined
these factors, results have varied. Therefore, researchers are interested in analyzing the
results with research objectives: companies incorporated in IDX30 on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange in the last five years (2018-2022). The company is an entity that significantly
influences the Indonesian economy. IDX30 Index is a stock market index that includes
30 of the largest and most liquid companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(IDX). Companies that are members of IDX30 have diverse profiles, ranging from the
financial, telecommunications, consumer, and energy sectors. Their presence reflects the
stability of the country's economy and becomes an essential indicator of the performance
of the Indonesian capital market. IDX30 is a benchmark for domestic and international
investors to measure the performance of the Indonesian stock market. By following
IDX30's movements, investors can gain extensive insight into market direction and
trends, allowing them to make more intelligent and informed investment decisions.
The hypothesis in this study is that the company sector has a positional influence
on audit delay in companies incorporated in IDX30 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(H_1); The company's profit and loss has a positional influence on audit delay in
Analysis of the Causes of Audit Delay in IDX30 Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(IDX)
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2909
companies incorporated in IDX30 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (H_2); The
probability of the company has a positional influence on audit delay in companies
incorporated in IDX30 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (H_3).
Method
This study uses the quantitative method to obtain the significance of the influence
between independent variables and dependent variables. The processed data is secondary
data sourced from the consolidated financial statements of each company listed in IDX30
on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). There are three independent or independent
variables, namely the company's sector, company profit and loss, and company
profitability, with one dependent variable, namely audit delay. The purposive sampling
technique is used by researchers to sample using several specified criteria (Bougie, 2017,
p. 67). The first criterion is that the company is listed in IDX30 on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange (IDX). Second, the company consecutively, namely five years (2018-2922)
classified as IDX30. Third, the company has complete financial statements for five
consecutive years (2018-2022). Finally, the company does not declare its consolidated
financial statements in currencies other than rupiah. Thus, from these criteria, 14
companies were studied with a total sample of 70.
Results and Discussion
This study used IBM SPSS SPSS 23 in processing the data obtained. There are four
variables, of which three are independent, namely the company's sector (X_1), company
profit and loss (X_2), and profitability (X_3), while one is a dependent variable, namely
audit delay (Y). A descriptive statistical test was carried out, and the results are shown in
Table 1. It can be seen that:
1. The audit delay showed a minimum value of 16, a maximum of 146, an average of
59.63, and a standard deviation of 28,227. In this case, the rta-average value obtained
is greater than the standard deviation (59.63 > 28.227), which can be interpreted as
heterogeneous data.
2. The company sector showed a minimum value of 1, a maximum of 7, an average of
3.43, and a standard deviation of 1,690. In this case, the rta-average value obtained is
greater than the standard deviation (3.43 > 1.690), meaning the data is heterogeneous.
3. The company's profit and loss showed a minimum value of 1.94, a maximum of
511.70, an average of 13606.15, and a standard deviation of 117499.57. In this case,
the average value obtained is greater than the standard deviation (13606.15 >
117499.57), which can be interpreted as indicating that the data is heterogeneous.
4. The company's profitability shows a minimum value of 0.37, a maximum of 46.66, an
average of 8.5954, and a standard deviation of 9.32555. In this case, the average value
obtained is less than the standard deviation (8.5945 > 9.32555), which can be
interpreted as homogeneous data.
Shinta Amalia, Hermawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2910
Table 1
Descriptive Statistical Test Results
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Std. Deviation
Audit_Delay
70
16
146
28.227
Sector
70
1
7
1.690
Laba_Rugi
70
1.94
511.70
117449.57
Profitability
70
.37
46.66
9.32555
Valid N
(listwise)
70
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Normality Test
The results of the Kolmogorox-Smirnov normality test, contained in Table 2, state
that asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) shows a figure of 0.200. This is greater than 0.05 and can mean
that the resulting distribution of existing data is expected.
Table 2
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Normality Test Results
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardize
d Residual
N
70
Normal Parameters
a,b
Mean
.0000000
Std. Deviation
21.91260499
Most Extreme
Differences
Absolute
.084
Positive
.065
Negative
-.084
Test Statistic
.084
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.200
c,d
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.
d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Uji Multicoloniniaritis
The results of the multicollinearity test contained in Table 3 show that the company
sector has a tolerance value of 0.850 with a VIF of 1,777, the company's profit and loss
has a tolerance value of 0.900 with a VIF of 1,111, and profitability has a tolerance value
of 0.778 with a VIF of 1,286. Theoretically, the condition as a data does not have
multicollinearity if the tolerance value < 0.10 and VIF > 10. The three variables show that
Analysis of the Causes of Audit Delay in IDX30 Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(IDX)
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2911
the question is valid in each result, so it can be concluded that the resulting regression
model does not have multicollinearity between independent variables in this study.
Table 3
Multicollinearity Test Results
Coefficients
Model
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
BRIGHT
1
(Constant)
Sector
.850
1.177
Laba_Rugi
.900
1.111
Profitability
.778
1.286
a. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
Heteroscedasticity Test
This test is carried out to determine the suitability between variables. In this case,
it is good research if there are different variances in the data; in other words,
heteroscedasticity does not occur (Yunita & Amin, 2023). Table 4 shows the results of
the heteroscedasticity test where the sig value. For the corporate sector, it was 0.503, the
company's profit and loss was 0.251, and profitability was 0.064. Data is said to have
much variance if the value of sig. > 0.05, it can be concluded that the three independent
variables state a value of >0.05 so that heteroscedasticity is considered not to occur.
Table 4
Heteroscedasticity Test Results
Coefficients
Model
Say.
1
(Constant)
Sector
.503
Laba_Rugi
.251
Profitability
.064
a. Dependent Variable:
Audit_Delay
Aji Telescope Watson
This autoregulation test is used to see whether the data presented shows a positive
or negative correlation. The results of the Durbin-Watson test in Table 5 show a value of
1.813. This value in Durbin Watson's theory is dw. In the Durbin-Watson test theory table
for three independent variables with 70 samples, the resulting dl value is 1.7028. It can
be seen that the results are due < dw < (4-du) or 1.7028 < 1.813 < 2.2972, so the resulting
conclusion is that in this study, autocorrelation is carried out.
Shinta Amalia, Hermawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2912
Table 5
Aji Telescope Watson
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. The error
of the Estimate
Durbin-
Watson
1
.630
a
.397
.370
22.405
1.813
a. Predictors: (Constant), Profitabilitas, Laba_Rugi, Sektor
b. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
Multiple Linear Regression Test
It can be seen in Table 6, which is the result of the multiple linear regression test or
anova test. The table shows that the value of audit delay shown by the name constant is
55,622. The value is obtained from the form of a multiple linear equation with the
following coefficient value:
1. The coefficient on the company's sector variable is 8,467 with a positive value, which
can be interpreted as audit delay will increase by 8,467.
2. The coefficient on the company's profit and loss variable of -1.215E-12 with a negative
value, which can be interpreted as audit delay, will be reduced by -1.215E-12.
3. The coefficient on the company's profitability variable is -0.988 with a negative value,
which can be interpreted as an audit delay that will be reduced by -0.988.
Table 6
Multiple Linear Regression Test
Coefficients
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity
Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Toleranc
e
VIF
1
(Const
ant)
55.622
7.004
7.941
.000
Sektor
8.467
1.731
.507
4.892
.000
.850
1.177
Laba_
Rugi
-
1.215E-
12
.000
-.506
-5.020
.000
.900
1.111
Profita
bilitas
-.988
.328
-.326
-3.011
.004
.778
1.286
a. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
Model Feasibility Test (Test F)
It can be seen in Table 7, which shows the result of the model feasibility test (F) or
hypothesis test. The table shows the value of sig. of 0.000, which is less than the alpha
value of 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) by the requirements of the regression model so that this study
is considered feasible. The conclusion that can be drawn is that the three independent
Analysis of the Causes of Audit Delay in IDX30 Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(IDX)
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2913
variables (company sector, company profit and loss, and profitability) affect the
dependent variable (audit delay).
Table 7
Model Feasibility Test (Test F)
ANOVA
a
Model
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
21845.147
3
7281.716
14.506
.000
b
Residual
33131.196
66
501.988
Total
54976.343
69
a. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
b. Predictors: (Constant), Profitabilitas, Laba_Rugi, Sektor
Individual Significant Test (T-Test)
It can be seen in Table 8, which shows the result of the individual significant test
(Test T). In this study, the significant level used was 0.025 or 2.5%. The company sector
shows a sig value of 0.000, which means < 0.025, so it is stated that the company's sector
variable affects the audit delay. The company's profit and loss shows a sig value of 0.000,
which means < 0.025, so it is stated that the company's profit and loss variable affects the
audit delay. The company's profitability shows a sig value of 0.004, which means <
0.025, so it is stated that the company's profitability variable affects the audit delay. In
this t-test, it can be concluded that the three independent variables affect the dependent
variable.
Table 8
Individual Significant Test (T-Test)
Coefficients
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity
Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Toleran
ce
VIF
1
(Consta
nt)
55.622
7.004
7.941
.000
Sektor
8.467
1.731
.507
4.892
.000
.850
1.177
Laba_R
ugi
-
1.215E-
12
.000
-.506
-5.020
.000
.900
1.111
Profitab
ilitas
-.988
.328
-.326
-3.011
.004
.778
1.286
a. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
Coefficient of Determination Test (R^2 Test)
Shinta Amalia, Hermawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2914
It can be seen in Table 9, which is the result of the coefficient of determination test
(Test R^2). The resulting adjusted R square value is 0.370 or 37%. This indicates that
37% of the causes of audit delays are the company's sector, company profit and loss, and
company profitability. The remaining 63% was due to other factors or variables not in
this study.
Table 9
Coefficient of Determination Test (R^2 Test)
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1
.630
a
.397
.370
22.405
a. Predictors: (Constant), Profitabilitas, Laba_Rugi, Sektor
b. Dependent Variable: Audit_Delay
Conclusion
The study consists of three independent variables, namely the company's sector,
company profit and loss, and profitability, to see the influence on the dependent variable,
namely audit delay. The object of this research is a company incorporated in IDX30 and
listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) within five years (2018-2022). Based on
the results and discussion in this study, it can be stated that the company's sector affects
audit delay, the company's profit and loss affect audit delay, and the company's
profitability affects the audit delay.
Analysis of the Causes of Audit Delay in IDX30 Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
(IDX)
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2915
Bibliography
Adhika Wijasari, Luh Komang, & Ary Wirajaya, I. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang
Mempengaruhi Fenomena Audit Delay di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal
Akuntansi, 168181.
Gustini, Emilia. (2020). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, profitabilitas, solvabilitas dan jenis
industri terhadap audit delay pada perusahaan LQ45 yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek
Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 11(2), 7181.
https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v11i2.1187
Hermawan, Alrin Trisa, & Suzan, Leny. (2018). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Leverage,
Dan Laba Rugi Terhadap Audit Delay. EProceedings of Management, 5(2).
Indriani, Alfiah. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi audit delay. Jurnal
Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 10(2), 198205.
Kurniawan, Anthusian Indra, & Laksito, Herry. (2015). Analisis faktor-faktor yang
mempengaruhi audit delay (Studi empiris pada perusahaan LQ 45 yang terdaftar
di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode tahun 2010-2013). Fakultas Ekonomika dan
Bisnis.
Liwe, Alther Gabriel, Manossoh, Hendrik, & Mawikere, Lidia M. (2018). Analisis
Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Delay (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan
Property Dan Real Estate Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Going
Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 13(02).
Louwers, Timothy J., Blay, Allen D., & Sinason, David H. (2018). Auditing & assurance
services. McGraw-Hill.
Nurrahmani, Ristia Maghrika, Handayani, Mega, & Nusa, Gerlan Haha. (2022). Pengaruh
Ukuran Perusahaan, Umur Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, Laba Rugi Dan
Ukuran Kap Terhadap Audit Delay. Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(1), 1323.
Rahmadhani, Indah Dwi, & Alexander, Alexander. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang
Mempengaruhi Audit Delay (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek
Indonesia Periode 2019-2020). Neo-Bis, 12(1), 7690.
Supadmo, Tri, & Arifin, Atwal. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan,
Kompleksitas Operasi Perusahaan Dan Reputasi Kap Terhadap Audit Report Lag
(Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek
Indonesia Tahun 2015-2017). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Ulita, Ade Sri, & Romdioni, Agus Nisfur. (2019). Pengaruh Laba Rugi, Opini Audit Dan
Lamanya Listing Terhadap Audit Delay. Musamus Accounting Journal, 1(2), 64
69.
Yunita, Eva Anggra, & Amin, Mohammad Arridho Nur. (2023). Pengaruh Laba Rugi
Shinta Amalia, Hermawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2024 2916
Perusahaan, Prediksi Kebangkrutan, dan Jenis Industri Terhadap Audit Delay pada
Perusahaan LQ45 yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Dialektika: Jurnal
Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 8(2), 191201.