Maghza Rizaka, Muhammad Wahid Hasyim
Indonesian Journal of Social Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4, April, 2024 1734
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฉ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฟข๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
from the standpoint of sanad connection. Furthermore, regarding the quality of the
narrators, the study revealed that certain narrators were deemed thiqah (trustworthy). In
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฟก๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ค๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฐ๎๎พค๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎
๎๎๎ฉ๎๎พ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ค๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎ค๎-Mundzir Al-Kufi. Furthermore, regarding his reliability, there
is a particular narrator, 'Athiyyah, who frequently commits errors. Regarding the 'illat and
syudhudh, Zahir did not identify any flaws or inconsistencies in the narrator's sanad
compared to a more reliable narrator.
๎ฌ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ค๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฟข๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ง๎ฆ๎ง๎๎๎
๎๎ฆ๎งจ๎ฆ๎ฆช๎ฆฃ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎งฆ๎ง๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฐ๎๎๎๎๎ฟข๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
Upon closer examination, it has been discovered that a narrator, specifically Al-
A'mash, has been found to engage in tadlis. However, it cannot be definitively concluded
that the chain of transmission for this tradition is rejected solely on this basis. Ib๎๎๎พฃ๎๎๎๎๎
al-'Asqalany categorized medallist narrators into five levels, placing Al-A'mash in the
second level. Therefore, his narration is still considered valid and accepted, albeit with
some reservations, due to his esteemed status.
๎ฑ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎พฃ๎๎
๎ฏ๎
๎๎๎
๎๎๎ค๎
๎ฏ๎๎ท๎๎๎
๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎ค๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฌ๎
๎๎๎พฃ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ค๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎-๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎พฃ๎๎
๎ฏ๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎
third-level narrator. It should be noted that the traditions narrated by these medallist
narrators from the third and fourth levels can only be considered reliable if there are
additional justifications for their acceptance.
Furthermore, 'Athiyyah, classified as a mudallis narrator, was discredited by
scholars such as Al-Nasa'i and Al-Dhahabi. Based on this, it can be inferred that the
๎ซ๎๎๎ฏ๎๎๎ ๎๎๎ ๎๎-Thaqalayn, as told by Imam al-๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฏ๎๎ ๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎ง๎๎๎๎ฏ๎๎ ๎๎บ๎๎๎๎๎
according to Sanad's critique.
From the criticism of the text of the hadith al-Thaqalayn in the narration of Imam
al-๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ฉ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ซ๎๎๎ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎ ๎ด๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎ถ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎t
contradict the traditions that have a higher level of strength and position, as mentioned in
the previous subheading of the Hadith about the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His
Prophet, which was narrated by Malik but weakened by Al-Bayhaqi and Al-Sakhawi in
their explanation in the book of al-Ajwibah al-๎ฐ๎๎๎พ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎ท๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
terms of common sense, the content of the text of the Hadith about the two heirlooms left
by the Prophet is not contradictory. The Qur'an is a guide and instruction for Muslims,
and there are instructions from the Prophet to give rights to the Ahl al-Bayt, which also
includes affection for the Messenger through respect for his descendants. Fourthly, the
Hadith stating that the Prophet left two legacies (the Qur'an and the Ahl al-Bayt) looks
like he made a will before his death for Muslims to abide by these instructions; hence, the