pISSN: 2723 - 6609 e-ISSN: 2745-5254
Vol. 5, No. 4 April 2024 http://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1454
Fiduciary in Civil Law and Bankruptcy Law Perspective
Herry Polontoh
1*
, Frans Reum
2
FH Univ Cenderawasih, Indonesia
1*
2
*Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Keywords: Fiduciary;
Civil law; Insolvency
Law.
The fiduciary gives the creditor the right to pledge his
property to the debtor as security for the debt given. In
practice, there are often disputes between creditors and
debtors related to fiduciaries. This dispute can occur due to
various factors, such as the default of the debtor or the
bankruptcy of the debtor. The purpose of this study is to
identify and analyze the regulation and practice of
fiduciaries from the perspective of civil law and bankruptcy
law. This study used normative research methods. Data
collection techniques are carried out by literature study. The
data that has been collected is then analyzed in three stages,
namely data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions.
The results showed that fiduciaries, in the perspective of
civil law and bankruptcy law, are a type of guarantee
provided by fiduciaries to other parties regarding collateral
transactions. Fiduciaries are generally included in the
fiduciary guarantee, a guarantee received by the party
applying for financing to guarantee payments made by the
fiduciary to the party applying for financing. From a civil
law perspective, legal liability is for a fiduciary who
transfers or leases the object of a fiduciary guarantee to
another party without the written consent of the fiduciary
beneficiary. In financial law, a fiduciary assigns or leases the
object of fiduciary guarantees to another party without the
written consent of the fiduciary recipient.
Introduction
As a developing country, Indonesia is committed to improving its country's
condition and moving in a better direction. The government actively strives to advance
various economic, social, and cultural sectors, with a concrete example being national
development. The rapid national development in Indonesia requires massive investment.
One of the crucial funding sources is financial institutions, including banks, which have
an essential role in collecting funds from the public and flowing them back to support
economic growth and development through lending (Nugraha, 2019). One of the material
guarantees that can be guaranteed in a debt receivable agreement is a Fiduciary
Guarantee.
Fiduciary in Civil Law and Bankruptcy Law Perspective
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1455
According to Law Number 42 of 1999, a fiduciary guarantee is a security right to
movable property, whether tangible or not, related to the debt-receivable relationship
between debtors and creditors. The debtor provides a fiduciary guarantee to the creditor
as collateral for the payment of his debt. Fiduciary guarantees give a fiduciary a privileged
position compared to other creditors. Fiduciary guarantees must be supported by a
certificate that a notary will notarise for a valid agreement. The certificate provides for
transferring ownership rights of objects based on trust between creditors and debtors. In
addition, fiduciary certificates provide executory rights, allowing fiduciary recipients to
confiscate objects without a court decision if the debtor violates the agreement (Kanwil
Babel, 2022).
The application of fiduciary guarantees has become common in lending and
borrowing transactions because the process is simple, easy, and fast. The current fiduciary
guarantee system allows fiduciary guarantors to control the pledged assets and use them
to run or support business activities funded through fiduciary secured loans (MUHYIDIN,
2019). In practice, there are often disputes between creditors and debtors related to
fiduciary guarantees. Such conflicts can arise due to various factors, such as breach of
contract (default) from a debtor that fails to fulfill its obligations or, in more extreme
cases, when the debtor is declared bankrupt. The provisions of the law in the field of
bankruptcy and the Fiduciary Law in force today lack legal protection for creditors
holding fiduciary guarantees in the settlement of bankruptcy assets.
Previous research (Nugraha, 2019) examined the legal principles of fiduciary
guarantees from the perspective of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary
guarantees. The results of the study showed that Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning
Fiduciary Guarantees, the process of occurrence of fiduciary guarantees by passing
property rights from the owner (debtor) based on the principal agreement (receivable debt
agreement) to creditors, but only the rights were handed over. Still, the goods remain in
the debtor's possession, or in other words, the ownership rights to the collateral object are
transferred to the Creditor/Fiduciary while the collateral is still physically under the
control of the Debtor/Fiduciary. In principle, Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary
Guarantees has regulated Fiduciary Guarantees in terms of material law has been fulfilled,
where the principles contained in fiduciary guarantees include: a. Elements of transfer of
property rights; b. Elements in trust from the fiduciary's point of view; c. An element of
trust from the fiduciary's point of view; d. Fixed elements in the possession of the owner
of the object.
Another study (Susilowati & Suharto, 2016) examined the legal consequences for
separatist creditors holding fiduciary security rights in the bankruptcy of limited liability
companies; the results of the study showed that the legal implications for separatist
creditors in the bankruptcy of limited liability companies are the waiting period to execute
the object of guarantee held by separatist creditors. The rights and obligations of separatist
creditors are that they are obliged to wait for a period of stay to execute the collateral
object, in addition to which separatist creditors are obliged to report the results of the
auction of the collateral object to the curator. The right received by separatist creditors is
Herry Polontoh, Frans Reum
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1456
to take precedence over repayment of receivables compared to other creditors; then, in
the secessionist creditors undergoing a period of stay, the curator must provide reasonable
protection as stipulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU.
The novelty of this research is the object of his study on fiduciary yaki from the
perspective of civil law and bankruptcy law, which has never been studied before. This
research can contribute to developing civil law theory and bankruptcy law, particularly in
broadening the understanding of the concept and implementation of fiduciaries. The study
results can be the basis for legal researchers and academics to conduct further research
and develop more complex fiduciary theories. This study aims to identify and analyze the
regulation and practice of fiduciaries from the perspective of civil law and bankruptcy
law.
Research Methods
This study used normative research methods. A normative research method is used
to study and analyze law by studying existing legal regulations. This method focuses on
learning theories, concepts, principles, and legal rules in legal documents such as laws,
government regulations, court decisions, and other legal documents (Yanova,
Komarudin, & Hadi, 2023). Data collection techniques are carried out by literature study.
This process involves searching, collecting, and analyzing various documents, scientific
journals, books, articles, and other publications related to the research subject. The data
that has been collected is then analyzed in three stages, namely data reduction, data
presentation, and conclusions.
Results and Discussion
In business, business capital is fundamental for business actors to run their business
operations. Although, ideally, business actors have enough capital to operate a business,
this is not always the case. Therefore, they often have to find additional sources of funding
through business capital lending activities as a solution to run their business operations.
Business actors get additional capital by being willing to pay back, along with interest or
other benefits, to lenders within a certain period. The business capital lending and
borrowing activity is then referred to as debt.
Talking about accounts receivable is not something new because, in fact, we often
encounter accounts receivable, especially in the business world. Receivables payable is a
lending and borrowing agreement in which one party gives money to the other, usually in
a written agreement. By definition, receivable debt is a lending and borrowing agreement
involving two parties, namely creditors who provide loans and debtors who receive loans,
with the object of the agreement being money (Bandem, Wisadnya, & Mordan, 2020).
Regarding receivable debt agreements, rights and obligations involving both parties are
reflected. In essence, the debtor's right is to get additional capital provided by the creditor;
on the other hand, the creditor has the right to receive commission or interest from the
agreement. This commission or interest is in return for the use of the capital provided to
the debtor and is usually stipulated in the terms of the agreement. In addition to rights,
Fiduciary in Civil Law and Bankruptcy Law Perspective
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1457
there are also obligations that each party must fulfill. The first obligation is for the
creditor, who is obliged to provide his loan to the debtor by the provisions in the
agreement. Meanwhile, the debtor must return the loan amount per what has been agreed
upon within the predetermined time limit.
Receivables payable activities are carried out by individuals with weak economies
and those whose economies are relatively well-off. Debt depends on the debtor's integrity
or personality, which creates confidence in the creditor that the debtor will fulfill the
payment obligation well. However, despite the good intentions of the debtor, it does not
guarantee that the loan will be fully repaid when due. This condition encourages the need
for additional agreements in accounts receivable transactions. The additional agreement
aims to provide a sense of security for creditors and enable debtors to carry out payment
obligations properly; these agreements guarantee the return of debts that have been given
by creditors (Koto & Faisal, 2021).
According to (Mulyati & Dwiputri, 2018), a guarantee is a dependant given by the
debtor and a third party to the creditor because the creditor has an interest that the debtor
must fulfill his obligations in an agreement. The functions of guarantees, according to the
opinion (Lawalata, 2017), are as follows:
1. Give the creditor the right and power to get repayment from collateral if the debtor
fails to fulfill the debt payment obligation at the time stipulated in the agreement.
2. Ensure that the debtor remains involved in transactions to fund his business so that the
risk of leaving his business or project that could harm himself or his company can be
prevented or minimized.
3. Encourage debtors to comply with their promises, especially in terms of repayment by
agreed terms, so that debtors and third parties who provide guarantees do not suffer
losses on the pledged wealth.
Based on this function, guarantees are fundamental in building trust among business
people and can improve compliance and stability of relationships between creditors and
debtors. One form of material guarantee is a fiduciary guarantee; fiduciary comes from
the Latin word "fiduciary," which means trust. This term indicates that the guarantor
entrusts his property rights to creditors as collateral for debt repayment without the
intention to transfer ownership of the object. If the debt is repaid, the collateral object will
again belong to the guarantor (Yasir, 2016).
According to the definition presented by (Jadidah, 2022), the fiduciary guarantee is
a conventional product used to protect creditors in a lend-loan agreement. Suppose the
debtor cannot fulfill his obligations at any time (default). In that case, the creditor has the
right to seek compensation from the debtor by executing fiduciary guarantees. Objects
used as objects of fiduciary guarantee can be tangible or intangible movable objects and
immovable objects that cannot be burdened with liability. The object of the fiduciary
guarantee must be clearly described in the deed, including the identification of the object
and an explanation of the proof of ownership. For objects that are in inventory and tend
to change or remain, their type, brand, and quality must be explained in detail (Silitonga,
2020).
Herry Polontoh, Frans Reum
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1458
In Indonesia, the provisions regarding fiduciary guarantees stipulated in Law
Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee, which was enacted on September
30, 1999, have the purpose of serving as a solid legal basis for binding movable objects,
both tangible and intangible, as well as immovable objects that cannot be encumbered
with the right of dependent, which are used as collateral for the repayment of certain
debts. This law has a broad scope in terms of guaranteed objects and transactions to be
guaranteed, aiming to meet the needs of the growing and complex business world. The
existence of these regulations has several vital points in the arrangement of fiduciary
guarantees comprehensively, such as:
1. The position of precedence for the fiduciary beneficiary creditor, which indicates that
in the case of debt repayment, the fiduciary beneficiary creditor has priority over the
pledged object
2. Guaranteeing existing and future debts indicates that fiduciary guarantees can be
provided for debts that existed at the time the agreement was made and for debts that
may arise in the future.
3. Fiduciary guarantees must be registered, which requires the registration of fiduciary
guarantees into registers established by the government.
4. The fiduciary guarantee certificate has executory power, indicating that in case of
default by the debtor, the fiduciary beneficiary creditor can directly execute the
collateral without going through judicial proceedings.
5. The imposition of a fiduciary guarantee cannot be recharged, indicating that the
fiduciary guarantee can only be given once and cannot be used as collateral for another
debt without prior release.
6. The fiduciary guarantee follows its object in the hands of anyone, indicating that
ownership of the pledged thing may change hands. However, the fiduciary guarantee
will still apply to the object.
Such guarantees provide a solid legal basis for protecting creditors and debtors and
ensure legal certainty in fiduciary guarantee transactions. Meanwhile, fluctuations are
expected in a business environment. When companies upgrade, they may be able to pay
creditors and meet their obligations. However, when companies experience a downturn,
they may have difficulty repaying credit to creditors, thus unable to fulfill their promises.
Conflicts often arise in the relationship between creditors and debtors, such as default or
bankruptcy.
By definition, default is non-compliance with the agreement's implementation. This
can occur because the deal is not carried out on time, followed by the proper standards,
or even implemented at all. Generally, a person can be considered in default if they do
not fulfill the agreed obligation if the obligation implemented is not perfect if the
obligation is carried out late, or if they perform actions prohibited by the agreement
(Sinaga & Darwis, 2020). Bankruptcy is a condition in which a company or individual
cannot pay its debts, and the company's activities must be stopped for that reason. This
condition occurs due to financial incapacity caused by financial stress or business
Fiduciary in Civil Law and Bankruptcy Law Perspective
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1459
setbacks. Bankruptcy occurs when the debtor cannot fulfill his obligation to pay debts to
creditors (YOGISWARA, Prathama, & Hutama, 2023).
When there is a conflict between debtors and creditors, fiduciary guarantees
become crucial for both parties. The importance of fiduciary guarantees is outlined in
civil law and bankruptcy law. According to civil law, article 1131 of the Civil Code states
that all debtor assets, both movable and fixed objects, existing and new ones that will
exist in the future, become collateral for all debt engagements. This means that the
provisions of the article are the basis for the provision of guarantees by a debtor to
creditors by using all his wealth. Furthermore, article 1132 of the Civil Code affirms that
property is a standard guarantee for all creditors who have bills against debtors. Revenue
from the sale of these objects is divided proportionally, according to the size of each
creditor's receivables, unless there is a valid reason to give priority to several creditors.
One creditor that can be given priority is a creditor who has a fiduciary guarantee.
This provision is in line with what is contained in bankruptcy law or contained in
Law 37 of 2004; Article 55 states that every creditor holding a lien, fiduciary guarantee,
lien, mortgage, or other collateral rights on the property can execute his rights as if the
bankruptcy had not occurred. This means that certain creditors, one of which is a fiduciary
guarantee, have the right to exercise their rights even if the debtor is in bankruptcy
proceedings. These creditors have precedence and can be separated from other creditors.
As mentioned by Munir Fuady, this concept refers to separatist creditors who have
collateral debts on property, such as holders of liens, mortgages, liens, fiduciaries, and
the like (Royke, 2014). These separatist creditors have a preferred position in the
regulation of bail law and bankruptcy law,
Furthermore, Article 56 (1) of the bankruptcy law states that the right of execution
of creditors mentioned in Article 55, together with the right of third parties to claim assets
that are in the control of the bankrupt debtor or receiver, will be suspended for a maximum
of 90 (ninety) days from the date of the court decision declaring the debtor bankrupt. The
fiduciary guarantor can execute his rights after the court pronounces a judgment declaring
the debtor bankrupt. However, the execution will be delayed for a maximum period of 90
days. So, based on the perspective of civil law and bankruptcy law, it can be concluded
that a fiduciary is a form of guarantee provided by a fiduciary to another party as part of
a guarantee transaction.
Fiduciaries are generally included in fiduciary guarantees, which are forms of
guarantee received by the party providing financing to guarantee payments that the
fiduciary beneficiary will make to the lender. The material guarantee ensures that the
debtor's debt will be repaid if the debtor fails to fulfill its obligations. In the existence of
this guarantee, the creditor is protected because the loan is given to the debtor as
collateral. In addition, fiduciary guarantees give creditors the right and power to obtain
returns from collateral if the debtor cannot fulfill its obligations, i.e., fails to pay off its
debt as agreed. It also ensures that the debtor remains involved in the transaction to
finance his business, thus preventing the possibility of leaving his business or project
Herry Polontoh, Frans Reum
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1460
without accountability or at least reducing such risks (Shania, Sanusi, & Darmawan,
2022)
In general, in the law of security whose object is movable property, the debtor
cannot transfer, mortgage, or lease to another party the object that is the object of fiduciary
guarantee unless the object is an inventory object. However, in the context of fiduciary
guarantees, the transfer of such objects may be permissible, provided there must be notice
to or consent from the creditor. This is not allowed if the debtor transfers the object of the
fiduciary guarantee without being known or without the creditor's consent (Hamka,
2023).
Suppose the creditor transfers the object of the fiduciary guarantee without the
written consent of the fiduciary recipient. In that case, it will violate the legal provisions
stipulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee. Article 23, paragraph
2 of the law states that a fiduciary is prohibited from transferring, mortgaging, or leasing
to another party the object of the fiduciary guarantee unless it is an object of stock, and
even for that, the prior written consent of the fiduciary beneficiary is required.
Furthermore, Article 36, paragraph 2 of the same law states that if the fiduciary violates
the provision by transferring, mortgaging, or leasing the object of the fiduciary guarantee
without the written consent of the fiduciary recipient, then the fiduciary may be subject
to imprisonment for a maximum of 2 years and a maximum fine of Rp.50,000,000,-.
A legal provision provides criminal sanctions against fiduciaries who violate the
rules regarding the transfer of fiduciary guarantee objects without the written consent of
the fiduciary recipient. This aims to maintain integrity and trust in the relationship
between fiduciaries and recipients and maintain legal certainty in fiduciary guarantee
transactions. Meanwhile, from a civil law perspective, the debtor is legally liable if it
transfers or leases the object of the fiduciary guarantee to another party without the
written consent of the fiduciary beneficiary. Based on the debtor's actions, this can be
considered a violation of the previously agreed agreement. According to Article 1243 of
the Civil Code, debtors must reimburse costs, losses, and interest arising from non-
fulfillment of an agreement. This obligation applies when the debtor, despite being
declared negligent, does not fulfill the obligations stipulated in the contract. The same
applies if the agreement can be executed only after the deadline.
Article 1234 of the Civil Code contains legal elements such as the existence of an
agreement, there is one party who breaks the promise or violates the terms of the
agreement, and even though it has been declared negligent, it still does not implement the
contents of the agreement. Then, according to Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the party
that suffers a loss has the right to choose between two actions. First, they can force the
other party to comply with the agreement made if it is still possible. Second, they can also
file a claim for cancellation of the agreement while demanding reimbursement of costs,
losses, and interest that may arise due to the breach of the agreement.
The study results concluded that the provision of fiduciaries from the perspective
of civil law and bankruptcy law provides a clear legal basis for fulfilling agreements and
protecting the rights of parties involved in transactions. It can then increase trust among
Fiduciary in Civil Law and Bankruptcy Law Perspective
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1461
parties involved in financial transactions, including creditors and debtors. This increase
in trust can encourage lenders to provide loans on better terms and open the door for
debtors to expand their business by gaining access to additional financing. As a result, it
can support business sector growth by facilitating investment, project development, and
business expansion, as well as the broad impact of increasing credit and encouraging
overall business sector growth.
Conclusion
Fiduciary, in the perspective of civil law and bankruptcy law, is a form of guarantee
provided by a fiduciary to another party in the context of a guarantee transaction. A
fiduciary is generally included in a fiduciary guarantee that serves as a guarantee received
by the party providing the financing to guarantee payments that the fiduciary will make
to the party providing the funding. From a civil law perspective, there is a legal liability
against a fiduciary who transfers or leases the object of a fiduciary guarantee to another
party without the written consent of the fiduciary beneficiary. From a fiduciary law
perspective, the fiduciary is also responsible if he transfers or leases the object of the
fiduciary guarantee to another party without obtaining written consent from the fiduciary
recipient.
Bibliography
Bandem, I. Wayan, Wisadnya, Wayan, & Mordan, Timoteus. (2020). Akibat Hukum
Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Hutang-Piutang. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad
Kertha, 3(1), 4868.
Hamka, Husnul. (2023). Pemidanaan Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa
Herry Polontoh, Frans Reum
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2024 1462
Persetujuan Penerima Fidusia. Philosophia Law Review, 3(1), 113.
https://doi.org/10.56591/pilar.v3i1.19320
Jadidah, Fikrotul. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan
Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/Puu-
Xvii/2019). Iblam Law Review, 2(2), 1737. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i2.69
Koto, Ismail, & Faisal, Faisal. (2021). Penerapan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda
Bergerak Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi. Journal of Education, Humaniora and
Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 774781. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.739
Lawalata, Izaac Lucas Dominggus. (2017). Pemenuhan hak eksekusi kreditur separatis
dalam penjaminan dari perspektif undang-undang kepailitan. Akmen Jurnal Ilmiah,
14(2).
MUHYIDIN, MUHYIDIN. (2019). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP
KREDITUR PEMEGANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM PEMBERESAN HARTA
PAILIT. Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang.
Mulyati, Etty, & Dwiputri, Fajrina Aprilianti. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam
Menganalisis Jaminan Kebendaan Sebagai Pengaman Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan.
ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(2), 134148.
Nugraha, Andi Wahyu Agung. (2019). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam
Perspektif Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Lex
Privatum, 6(10).
Shania, Intan, Sanusi, Sanusi, & Darmawan, Darmawan. (2022). Akibat Hukum Debitor
yang Menyewakan objek Jaminan fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan tertulis Kreditor.
Diversi, 8(1), 371881.
Silitonga, Sarma. (2020). Tanggungjawab Debitur Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia.
Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 130153.
Sinaga, Niru Anita, & Darwis, Nurlely. (2020). Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya Dalam
pelaksanaan perjanjian. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 7(2).
Susilowati, Etty, & Suharto, R. (2016). Akibat Hukum Bagi Kreditor Separatis
Pemegang Hak Jaminan Fidusia pada Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus:
Putusan Ma No. 4/Pk/Pdt. sus-pailit/2014). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 114.
https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.11194
Yanova, Muhammad Hendri, Komarudin, Parman, & Hadi, Hendra. (2023). Metode
Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum Dengan Metode Penelitian
Normatif Dan Empiris. Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 394408.
https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423
Yasir, Muhammad. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan
Budaya Syar-I, 3, 7592.
YOGISWARA, I. GEDE MAHATMA, Prathama, Anak Agung Gede Agung Indra, &
Hutama, I. Dewa Made Adhi. (2023). KEWAJIBAN KREDITUR DALAM
MEMBERIKAN HAK DEBITUR UNTUK MENGAJUKAN PENANGGUHAN
PEMBAYARAN HUTANG SEBELUM PAILIT. Jurnal Yustitia, 17(01), 7581.